📝 Setting a specific field or topic for the model to focus on will help it understand the purpose of the conversation and provide more relevant answers.
\U0001f6a8\U0001f6a8 How to get 10x better responses with this secret ChatGPT Prompt Hack \U0001f6a8\U0001f6a8
— Linus (\u25cf\u1d17\u25cf) (@LinusEkenstam) January 12, 2023
\u2705 It will guarantee to give you better answers in ChatGPT
\U0001f9d9\U0001f3fb\u200d\u2642\ufe0f Follow these 7 steps:
\U0001f9f5 Thread, Let's dive in pic.twitter.com/l6Fll8ASj9
\U0001f4dd You and your grandma is using ChatGPT wrong
— Linus (\u25cf\u1d17\u25cf) (@LinusEkenstam) January 3, 2023
\U0001f9e0 Let's get you into EXPERT mode, seriously
\U0001f4c8 Here are some quick tips to get you from n00b to PRO
\U0001f4ac prompts in thread \U0001f9f5 pic.twitter.com/x3Zy5tGd8J
7 ChatGPT Apps, Hacks, and Extensions you can't live without
— Linus (\u25cf\u1d17\u25cf) (@LinusEkenstam) January 7, 2023
(All are currently Free)
\U0001f9f5 A thread pic.twitter.com/zxgvtmdx3i
\U0001f916 ChatGPT is your new market researcher
— Linus (\u25cf\u1d17\u25cf) (@LinusEkenstam) January 10, 2023
\U0001f50e Are you looking for competitors, market landscape, content ideas, arguments, and perspectives?
\U0001f4ac Simple prompts included
\U0001f9f5 Let's dive in pic.twitter.com/qQSzgI26Qy
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw