However, they provide no insight into the issue of those who Desist or Detransition being people of gender diversity. Failure to address these issues calls their standing as a charity and PIC into doubt.
Gender Intelligence is a Charity and Public Interest Company. As such, they are obliged to meet their stated aims, else face investigation.
Gender Intelligence seems to think they can say one thing and do another with impunity.
Their claims and actions do not agree. cont:
However, they provide no insight into the issue of those who Desist or Detransition being people of gender diversity. Failure to address these issues calls their standing as a charity and PIC into doubt.
"GI’s aims are:
to engage the wider community in understanding the diversity and complexity of gender".
They use the term Complexity and yet deliberately and purposefully ignore those who Desists or Detransition.
The issue of bias is clear.
The word "Detransition" is not used once on the whole website
https://t.co/VFDPVlBuB6
https://t.co/6lqmfrHcrs
Their objects are stated in Full Caps as shown on the charity commissioner web portal - Documents - text image for clarity
https://t.co/UhGiniMVTI
They cite the UN Universal Declaration Of Human Rights cont:
Cont:
Cont:
"PEOPLE WHOSE EXPERIENCE OF SEX, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND/OR SEXUALITY DOES NOT ALIGN, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITH DOMINANT CULTURAL EXPECTATIONS".
(A) MONITORING ABUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS;
How can they do this if they ignore those who desist or detransition?
Do these people's human rights not count to Gender Intelligence?
(B) OBTAINING REDRESS FOR THE VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE;
How can they do this if they ignore those who desist or detransition?
Do these people's human rights not count to Gender Intelligence?
C) RELIEVING NEED AMONG THE VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE;
How can they do this if they ignore those who desist or detransition?
Do these people's human rights not count to Gender Intelligence?
(D) RESEARCH INTO HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES;
If gender Intelligence does not even acknowledge that those who desist or transition exist, they can't be counted in research on any subject, including Human Rights Abuse.
(E) PROVIDING TECHNICAL ADVICE TO GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS ON HUMAN RIGHTS MATTERS;
If Gender Intelligence does not recognise the existence of those who desist or detransition, there can be no valid advice to the government due to bias.
(F) CONTRIBUTING TO THE SOUND ADMINISTRATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW;
There can be no sound administration of any law whilst Gender Intelligence ignore the existence of those who desist or detransition, their Charitable Beneficiaries.
(G) COMMENTING ON PROPOSED HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION;
Any and all comment will be partisan and biased whilst Gender Intelligence ignore those who desist or detransition as they are Beneficiaries of The Charity and ignored.
(H) RAISING AWARENESS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES;
Any awareness-raising will be subject to partisan bias and negligence as long as Gender Intelligence ignore their beneficiaries - those who desist or detransition.
It's illegal under the Equality Act 2010, section 13.1 Direct Discrimination
Gender Intelligence's charitable articles are clear that those who Desist or Detransition are beneficiaries. Treating them as not Trans or included is Indirect Discrimination.
It indicates that Gender Intelligence can be sued for Discrimination.
Gender Intelligence is Not Fit For Purpose.
@threadreaderapp unroll
More from All
You May Also Like
1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
1/\u201cWhat would need to be true for you to\u2026.X\u201d
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) December 4, 2018
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody: https://t.co/Yo6jHbSit9
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
✨📱 iOS 12.1 📱✨
🗓 Release date: October 30, 2018
📝 New Emojis: 158
https://t.co/bx8XjhiCiB
New in iOS 12.1: 🥰 Smiling Face With 3 Hearts https://t.co/6eajdvueip
New in iOS 12.1: 🥵 Hot Face https://t.co/jhTv1elltB
New in iOS 12.1: 🥶 Cold Face https://t.co/EIjyl6yZrF
New in iOS 12.1: 🥳 Partying Face https://t.co/p8FDNEQ3LJ
🗓 Release date: October 30, 2018
📝 New Emojis: 158
https://t.co/bx8XjhiCiB
New in iOS 12.1: 🥰 Smiling Face With 3 Hearts https://t.co/6eajdvueip
New in iOS 12.1: 🥵 Hot Face https://t.co/jhTv1elltB
New in iOS 12.1: 🥶 Cold Face https://t.co/EIjyl6yZrF
New in iOS 12.1: 🥳 Partying Face https://t.co/p8FDNEQ3LJ