Judging by the responses of mostly male, gender ideologists, the thing that shocked them most about the Keira Bell judgement was that it was the welfare of the child that was foremost in the Judge's minds.

The Judges forensically looked at the evidence & decided on the basis of the evidence produced that children could not properly consent to experimental treatment.

Gender ideologues are so used to their views being privileged this was quite a shock for them.

English courts have once again established the primacy of the principle that the welfare of the child is paramount.

The fact that this basic tenet of law was uncertain shows how far gender ideology has ingressed into our social structures.

Thank you Keira, Susan Evans, Mrs A❤

@lecanardnoir FULL TEXT

TAVI/GIDS Whistle Blower said 2 years ago that the service was Not Fit For Purpose and that Consent was being ignored.

When an NHS Trust attacks the messenger you know there is a Scandle and Cover

@buzz_chronicles save

@CforWomenUK Thank you! In sisterhood and solidarity, from a life-long and now politically homeless lefty.

More Evidence That Stonewall UK Ltd (Supposed Charity) no longer represents LGB people in The UK.

They Removed the LGB in Feb 2015 and have been too busy to celebrate UK LGB Milestones since. They seem to think they are American and based on Christoper Street New York.

The Date To Remember - 28 October 1999.

The Place - The House Of Lords

The Names - Mr. John Thompson and Mr. Martin Fitzpatrick

The First Legal GAY Family in the UK.

What was most shocking is Mr Thompson had been dead for 5 years.

Martin and John had lived together for 18 years in what the law lords described as a "longstanding, close, loving and faithful, monogamous, homosexual relationship.".

Even so, Martin Fitzpatrick was told to leave his home when John died. John was the tenant and Martin was not.

If they had been a Straight Couple and unmarried that would not have happened - the Common Law Spouse would have inherited the tenancy.

Martin refused to leave his home - he sued for Human Rights Abuse. He was not willing to have anyone trash his Private and Family Life.

More so, during the relationship, John had been taken ill and was left profoundly disabled. As the judges noted;

"after various unfortunate incidents at the hospital, the applicant took Mr. Thompson home in April 1986 to care for him full time himself. ...