A Brazilian Butt Lift has a mortality rate of 1 in 3000. Beauty is subjective, yet it matters enough to human beings that we give our lives for it. If we consider masks to be ugly, then that can be sufficient reason not to wear them. Aesthetics matter.

Cave diving ends in death once every 3286 dives. We don't prohibit it, we let people decide for themselves whether this existentially meaningful experience is worth the risk to them. It's not the role of public health to decide which risks human beings are allowed to take.
This my friends, is the real issue to comprehend. "Masks don't work" or "lockdowns don't work" are all nice, but ultimately secondary arguments. A cabal of pencil-necked conscientious technocrats should not have the right to make these type of decisions for us.
If you go down the road of masks and lockdowns don't work/the virus is not very deadly, you're not hitting the core of the problem: They have no right to decide for us what the human experience should entail. We want freedom because we want freedom, not because of a pie chart.
"But what about seatbelts?!?" There's a difference between natural rights and legal rights. Natural rights are derived from observing nature. There are no cars in nature. What the public health class wants is to violate natural rights.
Freedom of assembly, religion, medical self-determination, these are the sort of products of natural rights, that derive from observing how the natural world functions, that are now under threat.

More from All

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?

You May Also Like

I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party