1. Some useful, albeit not fully developed, critiques of:

“The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review"

https://t.co/C9TyRyqHUr

have just been published here:
https://t.co/qCmzGCzRxn
by members of DRASTIC & others
@angoffinet @BahulikarRahul @MonaRahalkar @gdemaneuf

2. A refreshing contrast to the so-called "expert reactions" found here, including from one of the authors of the review (Prof David Robertson)!

"expert reaction to a preprint reviewing the evidence on the origins of SARS-CoV-2"

https://t.co/6kG6rstweP
3. Peter Gutierrez points out in his response that 4 of the authors of “The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review”, also wrote “Proximal Origin of SARS-COV-2”.

His critique focuses on:

1. RaTG13

2. Enhanced adaptation to the human host

https://t.co/eW8b2iK5xe
4. As to be expected, Sydney University and its iconic virologist, Eddie Holmes, who is "not available for interview", are crowing over this biased review
https://t.co/xrjpN1NxpO
This review contains elementary errors as exposed here:
1. https://t.co/YJ50huifly
one of the authors (Stuart Neil) then claimed
"Didn’t N501Y come up in ACE2 TG mice too?
https://t.co/HscNSEKdrZ
Professor Neil failed to respond
https://t.co/ldzuAMDiF9
You will have to dig into the answers here
https://t.co/OaLzUfIPuA
A thread with papers to educate Stuart here:
https://t.co/BFVxXlVKj4
Which he didn't take kindly to
https://t.co/k93d6gVR8s
I guess it was his way of admitting he was wrong about N501Y?
Again Prof Neil, one of the authors of the review continues to embarrass himself. I am starting to think that the flawed N501 claim was actually written by him.
https://t.co/Syn3CNd5ne
Wrong again, "Prof"
https://t.co/cH4jY6HOfe
He just can't admit his error, so I have to remind him
https://t.co/ZIPRFOHDGE
A further elementary error in the review paper

The Straw Lab Fallacy

https://t.co/kS9wCBkgvr
To be continued....
Another critique (July 8th) - 30 Tweets

A long thread by @Rossana38510044 debunking the claims in "Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Pathetic Review"

https://t.co/Un0h4cm3vi

Saved:

https://t.co/8eDdbKWdqf

Archived:

https://t.co/8bfaU4nWXo
An excellent and thorough critique by @aychan here (12th July)

A response to “The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review”

https://t.co/QrqL9DlBGh

Archived:

https://t.co/UA29u7D3v0

More from Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

@jimmy_wales Thanks for replying!
1/. I will make a thread here with some details so you can see for yourself how a small clique of pro Chinese gatekeeping editors and admins have bullied editors, throttled dissent and gamed the system to impose their POV.

2/. I am a supporter of


3/. This is what I ended up feeling about WP after


4/. Some disturbing


5./ Some members of the gatekeeping
Same covid-19 mutations are appearing in different places, which may or may not be strange....
41,000 mutations documented in 880 lineages.
Most in spike protein
What explains it?


https://t.co/MvHzUb4peo


https://t.co/PAwgC3lgsO


https://t.co/f9rnyFI0vq


https://t.co/wAlyNzuI0W
@EricTopol @NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad B.1.1.7 reveals clearly that SARS-CoV-2 is reverting to its original pre-outbreak condition, i.e. adapted to transgenic hACE2 mice (either Baric's BALB/c ones or others used at WIV labs during chimeric bat coronavirus experiments aimed at developing a pan betacoronavirus vaccine)

@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad 1. From Day 1, SARS-COV-2 was very well adapted to humans .....and transgenic hACE2 Mice


@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad 2. High Probability of serial passaging in Transgenic Mice expressing hACE2 in genesis of SARS-COV-2


@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad B.1.1.7 has an unusually large number of genetic changes, ... found to date in mouse-adapted SARS-CoV2 and is also seen in ferret infections.
https://t.co/9Z4oJmkcKj


@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad We adapted a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 by serial passaging in the ... Thus, this mouse-adapted strain and associated challenge model should be ... (B) SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA loads in mouse lung homogenates at P0 to P6.
https://t.co/I90OOCJg7o
1/ BIO TERROR! History, Present and Future....
Human experimentation, modern nightmares and lone madmen in the twentieth

2/ BIO TERROR! History, Present and Future....
The History of Biological Weapons Use:
What We Know and What We Don't. W. Seth

3/ BIO TERROR! History, Present and Future....
Biological Warfare in the 17th Century
W. Seth Carus
https://t.co/GEnU8fUC3m
and
Biological Warfare Plan in the 17th Century—the Siege of Candia,

4/ BIO TERROR! History, Present and Future....
Biological Warfare at the 1346 Siege of Caffa
https://t.co/BQZ8riLq1o
The 'Hittite Plague', an Epidemic of Tularemia and the First Record of Biological

5/ BIO TERROR! History, Present and Future....
The Plague of Athens: An Ancient Act of Bioterrorism?
https://t.co/YjiG4PspCA
Applying Modern Immunology to the Plague of
Ancient
1. Omicron Thread - A Compilation of Opinions

"finally, the time has slip and slid its slimy course through to us - and we're the vicious bastards of the new generation. we do not relent, and we should not be held to account for our ancestral faults"

https://t.co/mhJO6yOQRE


2. The Letter Chosen by the WHO

"It's amazing that the Xi variant seems to have somehow managed to evade detection..."

via @readomain

Why 'Omicron', Not 'Nu' or 'Xi'?

WHO Says Two Letters in Greek Alphabet Jumped to 'Avoid Stigma'

https://t.co/xnGR9XK2tF


3. The Omicron variant has been found in nearly every province of South Africa, as well as Botswana, Belgium, Israel, UK and Hong Kong.

This month, Israel held an exercise, The “Omega Exercise”, meant to prepare for a hypothetical, new COVID-19

4. Omicron Infographic

(appeared in Germany and Italy now)

https://t.co/oNFYBH1F1o


5. Overview of Omicron (B.1.1.529) from @nicd_sa

https://t.co/HN9csJqK0z

More from All

You May Also Like

1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.

Please add your own.

2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you


3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.

“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”

“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”

4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:

“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”

“What’s end-game here?”

“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”

5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:

“What would the best version of yourself do”?
I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.