How can we use language supervision to learn better visual representations for robotics?

Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!

Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z

🧵👇(1 / 12)

Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.

Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)
The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).

The secret is *balance* (3/12)
Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:

1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.

2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)
By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.

Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)
Because robotics isn't a single thing! While prior work focuses on learning for control, there are so many problems we care about – problems that require different features!

How do we know?

Because we build an evaluation suite of 5 diverse robotics problem domains! (6/12)
Problems like grasp affordance prediction (per-pixel segmentation) tend to require more *low-level* spatial features; edges, object boundaries, textures.

Evaluation: the ARC Grasping dataset (https://t.co/rRI4ya84DL) – CC @andyzengtweets @SongShuran. (7/12)
Learning for control tasks benefit from representations that mix of low and high-level features.

Modeling *multi-frame* contexts (easy with Voltron) is also high-impact!

Evaluation: Franka Kitchen & Adroit Manipulation domains from R3M – CC @aravindr93 @Vikashplus. (8/12)
Really cool is how we can use the generative language model zero-shot, with no extra data.

Given a video & language intent, we can score – in real time – how well the behavior in the video captures the intent.

Transfers to *robot data* – no robots during pretraining! (9/12)
But don't take our word for it – try out our representations yourself... or evaluate your own!

Models & Pretraining: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation Suite: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z

Use our models: `pip install voltron-robotics` (10/12)
This project was a huge endeavor; one that would not have been possible without amazing collaborators and mentors – @SurajNair_1 @_anniechen_ @tkollar @chelseabfinn @DorsaSadigh and @percyliang.

Further thanks to @ToyotaResearch, @stanfordnlp, and the @StanfordAILab ! (11/12)
I'm really excited to see the impact of language on shaping representations for robotics... but this isn't the end. The hard parts of robotics remain hard.

Voltron is a building block – a tool. I can't wait to see how y'all use it. Thanks folks – and stay tuned 🤖🚀! (12/12)

More from All

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?