Wow. Great speech by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Milley:
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) June 24, 2021
"I want to understand white rage....I want to understand what caused thousands of people to assault this building and try to overturn the constitution of the United States." 1/
pic.twitter.com/lxVpPO9BHE
Trump's speech was another incitement for violence. The Right views the military as an impediment against another insurrection/potential coup. This is why Trump & the Echo Chamber have been coordinating an assault on the legitimacy/stability of the military. It's important...1/ https://t.co/Lvs4a0jKl3
\u201cIn one of the only original passages in his Ohio speech, he criticized \u2018woke generals\u2019 and claimed that \u2018our military will be incapable of fighting and incapable of taking orders.\u2019 America\u2019s \u2018military brass have become weak and ineffective leaders.\u2019\u201d https://t.co/IHqNTcgILg
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) June 27, 2021
The Echo Chamber knows that FOX is on nearly every TV in and around military bases, so when Ted Cruz talks about the military being emasculated....3/ https://t.co/mto4I2ppse
Holy crap.
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) May 20, 2021
Perhaps a woke, emasculated military is not the best idea.... https://t.co/8aVFMW98NM
With Generals like this it\u2019s no wonder we\u2019ve fought considerably more wars than we\u2019ve won. https://t.co/wt43YAs6cU
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) June 23, 2021
I personally would like American generals to read less about \u201cwhite rage\u201d (whatever that is) and more about \u201cnot losing wars.\u201d
— J.D. Vance (@JDVance1) June 25, 2021
An angry Laura Ingraham says she\u2019s totally outraged over General Milley after she suggests withholding funding to the military pic.twitter.com/wApq1qytRV
— Acyn (@Acyn) June 24, 2021
Tucker: Mark Milley is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He didn\u2019t get that job because he\u2019s brilliant or because he\u2019s brave or because the people who know him respect him. He is not and they definitely don\u2019t pic.twitter.com/MJv4n8T0jP
— Acyn (@Acyn) June 25, 2021
Tucker on Milley\u2019s comments: He\u2019s not just a pig. He\u2019s stupid pic.twitter.com/XNxNCBjLHp
— Acyn (@Acyn) June 25, 2021
If we step back from the obvious, I was in the military and survived indoctrination, faux news is in the business of social molding. Planting a seed of doubt about the "patriotism" of high-ranking officers will make it easier for NCOs to lead teams to sedition. The long game.
— \U0001f432Kari Drekas\xf6ngvari\U0001f409 (@Dragonsinger52) June 25, 2021
Anyone know any F-15 dealers?
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) June 25, 2021
Asking for a friend\u2026
This has increased the chances of it happening again.
Read this thread: 11/ https://t.co/32LmTQUzes
In Nov., Trump pushed election lies.
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) June 6, 2021
2 months later, the insurrection/first non-peaceful transition of power in U.S. history occurred.
Aside from August being 2 months away, there\u2019s another dangerous parallel:
"Pathologically unrealistic expectations"
On election morning\u20261/ https://t.co/jMVgEONW0a
There will be violence. That's probably what would have occurred if Trump hadn't "won" the election b/c he'd already convinced his base that the system was rigged (which it was...in his favor). His election, and perhaps imminent removal, only delayed the violence...
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) August 7, 2018
Bringing this full circle, I could see a scenario when he finally is forced out, regardless of whether voted or dragged out (but especially if he's dragged out), his pathology will not only compel him to create a narrative of persecution and martyrdom, 6/ https://t.co/C3uq19K5dL
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) April 20, 2019
\u2026.but he will desire as much rebellion and revolt as possible because it will help offset the shame of his election loss/impeachment/indictment, because if people (his base) are willing to go to those extremes for him, then he *must* be a \u201cgreat\u201d man... https://t.co/q7TMXPgrHH
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) April 20, 2019
Civil unrest....when perceived to be inspired by tribal loyalty/cult membership allegiance.....is one of the greatest sources of narcissistic supply. There's been glimpses of Trump's fascination with the intoxicating thought of civil war, revolt against his impeachment, etc...1/ https://t.co/Ti3CSf6FGS
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) April 17, 2020
"The leaders of the Democratic Party no longer believe in democracy, & they definitely don't plan to lose another election..."
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) June 8, 2021
Incessant projection. This literally describes the Republican Party from the Big Lie...to Jan. 6th....to voter suppression laws.
This is one of...1/ https://t.co/R3BfQ9sgIt
There's a common theme that weaves through grievance politics, perpetual victimhood, \u201ccancel culture\u201d, the recent anti-riot laws, and the January 6th insurrection.
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) April 27, 2021
A recent example of perpetual victimhood and grievance was this rant by @TuckerCarlson. 1/pic.twitter.com/TEmUFYBgJx
This is occurring in politics.
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) May 9, 2021
Decades of fear mongering/demagoguery have conditioned people\u2019s primitive fear responses to be in a constant state of \u201chyper-vigilance\u201d (not unlike PTSD)....to see enemies everywhere.....and to view everything as a "threat" to their survival. 11/
An addiction model may actually explain tribalism, confirmation bias, and even conspiracy theories/Qanon. Let\u2019s unpack\u2026.
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) June 13, 2021
Several years ago I started observing the parallels between addiction and political tribalism as marriages/friendships/families imploded over politics\u2026.1/ https://t.co/jCNGeN42l2
How did the Right come to hate this country so much?
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) November 29, 2020
Remember when (justifiably) criticizing the United States, even over minor flaws/errors, would cause the Right to seethe with contempt over your lack of Patriotism?
Yet now,\u2026.1/
https://t.co/t5CcbeECCP
This is the game: The Right tries to thread the needle by denigrating leadership, & eroding citizens' trust in the institution, while still "supporting" rank & file "blue"/troops. For years they singled out FBI "leadership". They're doing the same now with the military. 1/ https://t.co/lC9E7eZ6ES
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) June 27, 2021
If they can "decapitate" the leadership from the institutional body.....it leaves a power vacuum.
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) June 27, 2021
"The speed of the leader determines the rate of the pack".
The Right is trying to recalibrate the speed of the institutional pack.......so it will follow the Authoritarian lead. 2/
More from Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych
Details/competency are boring, and expertise causes people to feel ignorant. So they choose reality TV stars over competent leaders, or actual mental health professionals.
Thank you. This is what happens when the press (all do this) serves some other interest than the public. A self-governing people should not tolerate this, or we get Donald Trump. https://t.co/UKfjcAypYE
— Bandy X Lee, MD, MDiv (@BandyXLee1) December 28, 2020
https://t.co/uMufgDNlaO
There's an interplay between "collective narcissism" & "American Exceptionalism" that creates resistance to learning. Learning requires voluntary intellectual subordination: an admission the "teacher" knows more than you. This triggers our narcissistic sense of exceptionalism..1/ https://t.co/DrmW7AXB6l
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) May 15, 2020
Great analysis. Now, what do we do about it. Do we need to \u2018reprogram\u2019 minds of those who\u2019ve fallen into a veil of deception? Do we treat these folks as cult victims? When it is a group narcissism, folks have to \u2018kill off\u2019 a part of themselves to escape, not easy recovery.
— Ponder (@Washyourowndish) April 23, 2021
No one is receptive to finding “common ground” when the starting point of the person who claims to desire common ground is telling them they’ve been brainwashed, and that they need to be “deprogrammed”. 2/
This plays into the “Totalitarian” narrative that Tucker Carlson is propagating, even going so far as using the “don’t believe your own eyes” to reinforce the narrative. 3/
Of course, this is exactly what occurred during Trump’s presidency. Basically, it’s another attempt to confuse and distract with moral/false equivalency. 4/
In the past, the Right attempted to excuse Trump’s pathological dishonesty with allegations of the Left lying: if everyone is lying, then no one is lying……because lying is normalized.
...or 2), a combination of: everything is a lie, therefore nothing is a lie\u2026.that lying is a necessary tactic to win or to compete against evil enemies (Libs/media) who are lying,\u2026or that they\u2019re in a Darwinian fight for survival where lying is a law of the political jungle.13/
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) July 6, 2019
In a recent thread about collective election anxiety/PTSD, I wrote that “one half the country doesn’t believe in evidence, the other half can’t trust it.” 2/
The collective anxiety is the by-product of two unfortunate realities of the Trump era:
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) October 20, 2020
1)You\u2019ll never go broke if you consistently bet on the ignorance/depravity of 1/3 of this country.
2)One-half of the country doesn\u2019t believe in evidence. The other half can\u2019t trust it.
1/ https://t.co/gY5lzJxNxq
This couldn’t more evident than by the fact that 87 percent of Trump supporters believe he will win re-election, despite the fact that… 3/
…the empirical data that shows Biden *should* win easily. This has resulted in https://t.co/e8JNg5tYmK calculating that Trump has only a 10% chance of winning. To be clear, 10% is a non-zero number, much like the 30% chance that Trump had in 2016. 4/
But the real problem isn’t necessarily about low probabilities, the real problem…..or more accurately, the danger…..lies in the pathologically unrealistic expectations of the cult of Trump: 90% of them have been conned into thinking that a 10% probability is a “sure thing”. 5/
When disinformation causes otherwise irrational behavior to appear rational.
Let's unpack.....1/
In the video above, @rubinreport uses Johnathon Isaac’s response about being unvaccinated to correctly encourage people to
- avoid summarily demonizing people
- have a measured, good-faith interpretation of other people's potentially good-faith “rational” motivations/actions
2/
I agree. Jonathon Isaac was very impressive in that interview.
We won’t make progress as a society by engaging in the same behavior that helped create the problem. And : 3/
Yes, fighting the temptation to name call (or "own the Cons"), rather than articulate the behavior is important. Calling them "Covidiots" is an indulgent lack of emotional discipline/maturity.
— Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych (@Nick_Carmody) September 4, 2021
It's difficult to solve the problem by engaging in the same problematic behavior. 1/ https://t.co/5FBK2jNI6f
Yet, just 12 seconds into the show, Rubin’s characterization of efforts to contain covid as attempts to “control”/tyrannize not only demonizes medical professionals (“elites”), but it’s also an implicit refusal to acknowledge ANY good faith motivation to protect public health: 4/
“[Covid is] going to be this constant cudgel that they can always use to control us and lock us down and put more rules on us, and all of the *stuff* that you all get since they’re always going to do that….. 5/