#Thread

The warning bell for BJP?
2019 May & 2024 - What could be the situation?

BJP loses Bengal:
The Congress & the left parties arose unitedly. Furthermore, the Furfura Sharief had locked hands with them building a front that the Ms could not but love. 1/n

Owaisi could not ally but was sure to split the M votes. The Hindus were disgruntled with the M appeasement of TMC. The critics from the state opined that Hindus were spoiling to teach Didi a lesson. 2/
So, with Ms going the other way and Hindus favoring the BJP, TMC was placed between a rock and a hard place. Bengal was ripe for an important change. 3/
This was the perception created by the media neglecting the reality on the ground. BJP & its local leaders were sitting on an ivory tower & having their calculations based on the defections. Perhaps, a deja-vu feel of the 2004 Shining India campaign?4/
At the dawn of 2nd of May, we found that none of the analyzed forecasts based on observations did happen. The Ms were careful and calculative not to allow splitting of their votes, at the last hour, apparently concluded that the didi was their biggest benefactor. 5/
So consolidated was their thinking that the Congress-Left-Furfura alliance did not get a single seat. Owaisi too drew a blank. 6/
Mamta came out as the biggest beneficiary of this consolidation. One has to keep in mind that this was the biggest win TMC has achieved so far. TMC couldn't have won so big without a good number of Hindu votes. 7/
It won a larger share of Hindu votes this time around perhaps, more than BJP! 8/
2nd May was a much more saddening day for BJP. Another election, the results of which were announced the same day was that of UP local elections.

The first blow was Mayavati winning quite a few seats. So, are the Dalits going back to their old party? 9
What about the Yadavs? Well, they had also revived their old love affair with SP. 10/
BJP may be the winner of these elections, but their victory was Pyrrhic - their total was just four seats more than SP. 11
The numbers can help some conclude that the BJP was a winner of these elections, the real conclusion is that the BJP was a loser with its Hindu vote bank fragmented into castes.12
Some may even reject this result as simply that of local elections. However, quite often the local election results forecast the results of bigger elections. This, Bengal results tell one that the Hindus do not mind voting for a leader who has not done anything assertive 4 them.
We just voted Mamata Banerjee to power. So, what exactly do the Hindus want? Jobs? Safety of their women? Security of their own lives. Hindu brain has become frozen. 14
Nothing records on Hindu minds now, not poverty, not dishonor of their women, not even loss of their own lives. Fact is, there is nothing called a Hindu-Vote-bank as other religions have. Hindus can be easily divided by castes - Reservation is one good tool to do so! 15
But let's disregard Bengal. Last time also, the BJP majority was without contribution from this state. However, UP is another matter wholly. 16
Both in 2014 & 2019, Our party BJP had won a very large number of seats from this state & the number of seats here played a large role in BJP achieving an overall majority in the Parliament. 17/
Furthermore, the SP and the BSP, the two principal parties of the state that failed either to gain a single seat or to get seats even in double numbers. 18
In 2024 too, BJP will require almost a repeat of the same performance if it wants to form a government. And that is exactly where the rub is. If the local election results are any indicator, the performance this time will fall much below the line. 19
Do you think the BJP will form govt? in 2024? Well, that question will be answered in 2022 itself when the state elections of UP are due. If the performance of BJP in these elections is poor, compose a piece of suitable music for Modi's farewell in 2024. 20/
So, the presumption of Amit Shah, the over-confidence of the party workers, too-much reliance on Modi's image (which is fading though and great effort applied by one and all in the recent past), 21
deafening silence on farmers' protest, more commercial and less of administration, etc., should be addressed and brought into control. 22
Take these warning bells precariously! No time to relax! Connect to the roots. Back to Basics! TINA will not go a long way! 23/
I just can't imagine Rahul or Priyanka or Mamata becoming the PM of this country! For this sake, BJP should wake up from their slumber; wriggle out of the perceptions and comfort zone.

Warning bells are deafening my ears and not theirs it seems... 24/24

More from sriram

More from All

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.