With this new feature, we can import JavaScript modules dynamically, as we need it.
This pattern is also known as code-splitting, and with ES2020 we can do this natively instead of relying on tools like Webpack.
ES2021 is going to land soon 🚀
It's gonna be really exciting.
Meanwhile - are you fully up to speed with all the cool things we got from ES2020?
Let's take a look at a few of them here 🧵 👇
With this new feature, we can import JavaScript modules dynamically, as we need it.
This pattern is also known as code-splitting, and with ES2020 we can do this natively instead of relying on tools like Webpack.
With this feature, we can now access deeply nested properties without having to null-check.
Notice how 'quxBaz' becomes undefined instead of throwing a reference error.
With Nullish Coalescing, we can now evaluate values that are 'nullish', not just 'falsy'.
Notice how the variable 'foo' is falsy, but not nullish (null or undefined).
In some cases, we want to use fallbacks only in the case of null or undefined.
More from All
You May Also Like
1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
1/\u201cWhat would need to be true for you to\u2026.X\u201d
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) December 4, 2018
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody: https://t.co/Yo6jHbSit9
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
