Which was seen in the temples of medieval Kashmir
O Idi0t @shakirqad that wasn't any private report of Pt. Anand Koul that was a research text of Archeological Survey of India.
It is just a page of your destructive & blo0dy History.
1) Koul Pandit Anand is an unreliable source of Kashmir's history and has been seen trying to pull rabbits out of his hat. For instance, Mr. Koul in his works also accuses the muslim rulers of having built the Pathar Masjid at Srinagar using the uprooted stairs of https://t.co/dz3O46sZ3j
— Shakir (@shakirqad) April 28, 2021
Which was seen in the temples of medieval Kashmir
A Muslim chronicler writes in Baharistan-i-Shahi "Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam and were massacred in case they refused to be converted And Sikandarpura (a city laid out by Sultan Sikandar) was laid out on the debris of the destroyed temples of the Hindus.
More from 🇮🇳
A scholar of Ayurveda in 600BC, identified 5 mosquito species as source of a "King of Diseases" causing chills & fevers.
For next 2500 yrs ur "Allopathy" & whole world thought, it causes due to Bad Air & named it MALARIA : Mal = Bad, Aria = Air.
This is the legacy of #Ayurveda https://t.co/M440lfZKWR
A British scientist named Joseph Constantine Carpue wrongfully accessed details of traditional Indian surgery (Ayurvedic) & Using these techniques, he performed world’s first “modern Rhinoplasty” 20 yrs later.
This is Your loved #Allopathy
UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA SPENDING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS & THEIR TIME ON ITS RESEARCH.
And some over educated doctors makes fun of
WHY THE HELL WEB MED is praising AYURVEDA? FOR WHAT JOY..?? Are they sifting their optics from alopathy to AYURVEDIC therapy to cure a disease... Can Dr. Anomitro reply to
WHY AYURVEDA IS MOST EXPENSIVE MEDICAL THERAPY IN FOREIGN LAND & ITS PERFORMANCE IS 100/100 WITHOUT FAILURE... Why Dr. Anomitro why??
For next 2500 yrs ur "Allopathy" & whole world thought, it causes due to Bad Air & named it MALARIA : Mal = Bad, Aria = Air.
This is the legacy of #Ayurveda https://t.co/M440lfZKWR
O dude. I pity your lack of common sense. I am asking if ayurveda is so effective, please reduce our patient load and let ayurved acharyas and hospitals treat the patients. I would like to go home. Instead of sitting in your room huffing roots, come and help out
— Dr. Anomitro Chakrabarty (@TheSkepticalMRI) May 26, 2021
A British scientist named Joseph Constantine Carpue wrongfully accessed details of traditional Indian surgery (Ayurvedic) & Using these techniques, he performed world’s first “modern Rhinoplasty” 20 yrs later.
This is Your loved #Allopathy
UNIVERISTY OF MINNESOTA SPENDING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS & THEIR TIME ON ITS RESEARCH.
And some over educated doctors makes fun of
WHY THE HELL WEB MED is praising AYURVEDA? FOR WHAT JOY..?? Are they sifting their optics from alopathy to AYURVEDIC therapy to cure a disease... Can Dr. Anomitro reply to
WHY AYURVEDA IS MOST EXPENSIVE MEDICAL THERAPY IN FOREIGN LAND & ITS PERFORMANCE IS 100/100 WITHOUT FAILURE... Why Dr. Anomitro why??
Part 2
Lengthy again..
By 1974 the debate focused on whether there was a credible risk of explosion from the liquid fuel, or if this was manageable.
This risk led to the beginning of a major policy debate in the very heart of the secret state about whether this was an acceptable level of risk, or if there were alternative options open to consider.
There appears to have been a difference of opinion between different parts of government on what the right answer was in this case.
To the Royal Navy, charged with delivering the nuclear deterrent mission, the only acceptable answer was to step away from Chevaline and Polaris and upgrade to Poesidon as quickly as possible to maintain the credibility of the deterrent.
By contrast No10 was growing increasingly frustrated with what it saw as an inability by the Royal Navy to focus on delivering a capable SSBN force, & its constant demands to goldplate the solution – in one memo to the Prime Minister from his Private Secretary there is the line:
Lengthy again..
By 1974 the debate focused on whether there was a credible risk of explosion from the liquid fuel, or if this was manageable.
Part 1
— \u2728 (@Aamani_03) November 15, 2021
It's a bit lengthy, just keep reading :)
The British Nuclear Policy In The 1970s. https://t.co/DE1A7e1SQ0 pic.twitter.com/VSuUgpVMk6
This risk led to the beginning of a major policy debate in the very heart of the secret state about whether this was an acceptable level of risk, or if there were alternative options open to consider.
There appears to have been a difference of opinion between different parts of government on what the right answer was in this case.
To the Royal Navy, charged with delivering the nuclear deterrent mission, the only acceptable answer was to step away from Chevaline and Polaris and upgrade to Poesidon as quickly as possible to maintain the credibility of the deterrent.
By contrast No10 was growing increasingly frustrated with what it saw as an inability by the Royal Navy to focus on delivering a capable SSBN force, & its constant demands to goldplate the solution – in one memo to the Prime Minister from his Private Secretary there is the line:
