2/
WAS THERE EVER AN ARYAN INVASION ?
A long 🧵but must read
One of the major reasons why a consideration of the idea of an Aryan invasion into India is prevalent among some Western researchers is because of their misinterpretation of the Vedas,
1/
2/
Prithus, and Parshus, who fought against the Tritsus. The Prithus or Parthavas became the Parthians of latter-day Iran (247 B.C.B224 A.D.).
3/
Western scholars could and did easily misinterpret this to mean an invasion of nomadic people called Aryans rather than simply a war in which the superior Aryan kings reestablished the spiritual values and the
4/
Aryan invasion theory was hypothesized in the nineteenth century to explain the similarities found in Sanskrit and the languages of Europe. One person who reported
about this is Deen Chandora in his article, Distorted Historical Events and
5/
Chronology, as it appeared in Revisiting Indus-Sarasvati Age and Ancient India (p. 383).
He explains that the idea of the Aryan invasion was certainly not a matter of misguided research, but was a
conspiracy to distribute deliberate misinformation
6/
This was to induct the theory of the Aryan invasion of India, so that no Indian may say that English are foreigners. . . India was ruled all along by outsiders and so the
7/
8/