Alex1Powell's Categories
Alex1Powell's Authors
Latest Saves
Some snippets.
Take a quick look into pro farmer measures of the government under the leadership of hon\u2019ble PM Shri @narendramodi since 2014 & the recent agricultural reforms that will help double farmers\u2019 income. https://t.co/6QgkerSfj8 #Aatmanirbharkrishi #FarmersFirst pic.twitter.com/FQN6L12Gdp
— MyGovIndia (@mygovindia) December 8, 2020
On the current #FarmLaws2020, there is much debate as to what may or may not happen.
WHAT WILL NOT HAPPEN
MSP will not go away; APMC Mandis will not close; Farmers land cannot be taken way
WHAT WILL HAPPEN
Farmers can sell in Mandis & outside; More income; More jobs. 2/10
So what was the need for #FarmLaws2020 reforms when as per Left groups all was well?
1) Fragmented markets
2) Insufficient markets
3) Inadequate Infra
4) Inadequate credit
While rest of the economy was opening up, farmers were restricted. Result - Huge Income Disparity. 3/10
What about the charge that there has not been adequate consultation before #FarmLaws2020 were passed?
THE TRUTH: Two decades of consultation. Farm Reforms are perhaps the only policy reforms where there has been consensus movement in SAME DIRECTION by multiple governments. 4/10
So what are the benefits of the law that allows the farmers to sell in APMC Mandis as at present but also, and importantly, anywhere outside?
1) Better price discovery for farmer
2) Converts present buyers market to sellers (farmer) market
3) Better logistics in rural areas
5/10
It involves the recognition that every medical intervention has risks which need to be balanced with
So I am wondering why the government is administering the Pfizer vaccine at all to healthy NHS staff.
We know the risks of significant illness in this group are really, really low.
In England, recorded deaths for people less than 60 years old with no pre-existing condition during the entire pandemic currently stands at
To place into context, in the 2017/8 winter season, there were 1470 deaths attributable to flu in the <65 year
To protect patients?
But as yet the vaccine has not even been shown to prevent infection or transmission, only reduce the severity of symtoms. Even Pfizer's CEO has stated as
None of the companies are claiming any reduction in the propensity to become infected, for example Pfizer's CEO is careful what he says here:https://t.co/wki00gMQoO
— Jonathan Engler (@jengleruk) December 7, 2020
Neighbors with questions about a horrible explosion. Finding answers. Whether we’ve learned anything after going through this time and again.
There’s never enough information when the chemical siren goes off. What happened? Is everybody OK? What was released? How much? Should we shelter or run? /3
These questions were supposed to be answered after Bhopal, (36 years ago this month: https://t.co/iiUlu2Zk7t) with passage of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act https://t.co/wjaHnUzqMu in 1986. / 4
Some of this information - chemical inventories, worst-case scenarios, response plans - is available (try https://t.co/4ojZWa4nF6) . But too much is hidden away, especially after post-9/11 secrecy measures. /5
So first off, at this point the evidence is pretty clear that SSRIs and other anti-anxiety/anti-depression drugs truly don't do very much. Their average effects are beneath clinical significance, as I tweeted about here:
What's the best recent empirical assessment of SSRI/SNRI effectiveness which deals with heterogeneity and long-term effects in a plausible way?
— Lyman Stone \u77f3\u4f86\u6c11 (@lymanstoneky) December 4, 2020
Basically, the problem these drugs face is that while they actually see relatively LARGE effects.... but that placebos in those trials ALSO see large effects (and most untreated depression improves within a year anyways).
So basically you have this problem where:
1. The condition tends to improve on its own in a majority of cases
2. Placebo effects for the condition are unusually large
Which means the large crude effects of SSRIs get swamped.
So that raises two new questions.
1. (Not my focus here) Are we treating these conditions appropriately given their untreated prognosis is usually (though certainly not always!!) "goes away in a few months"?
2. Why are placebo effects so unusually large?
\U0001f6a8JFK Started This WAR\U0001f6a8
— \U0001d541\U0001d53d\U0001d542 \U0001d552 \U0001d55d\U0001d552 \U0001d542\U0001d563\U0001d552\U0001d55c\U0001d556\U0001d55f (@JfkTebow) December 8, 2020
\U0001f4a5TRUMP will FINISH\U0001f4a5
\U0001f525Will YOU answer the CALL ?\U0001f525
\u2764\ufe0f\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\u267e Infinite Chills Making this one
\u2764\ufe0f\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\u267e Patriot Tears\U0001f62d@GenFlynn @SidneyPowell1 @CodeMonkeyZ @MajorPatriot @EmeraldRobinson @LLinWood @realDonaldTrump @gatewaypundit @rn__deplorable pic.twitter.com/J3AOcPWYBR
...written however by the American people rather than a criminal, nameless, faceless cabal.
We are fortunate to be witnessing the beginning of the ending of the control of earth by a relatively small set of families, crowned heads and others, who have been determining the world's path for literally centuries.
These are the families who ran and controlled the British, French, Spanish, Dutch, and more recent, German empires. Their wealth is all stolen and is practically incomprehensible.
They have been controlling the nations, using their wealth, but also, most importantly, their ability to create the currencies of the nations and use it for their own private purposes, which do not include the welfare of the peoples of the world, who they despise.
Consider the nomination of the 3rd Secretary of Defense: George Marshall
[THREAD]
In 1950, Truman wanted to fire the second SecDef, Louis Johnson, and install George Marshall as Secretary of Defense.
There was a problem: when the Department of Defense was created in 1947, section 202 of the 1947 National Security Act (which created the DoD, then called "The National Military Establishment") would not allow recently retired officers to serve as SecDef
https://t.co/bWx4h1OFah
Marshall had only retired as a 5-star General in 1947
Of course, by 1950 Marshall had already served as Secretary of State and had proposed the "Marshall Plan" for the recovery of Europe