King Shark, One Of The Greatest Afrikan Rulers Who Fought European Invasion In Afrika.
Thread!!!


Statue of King Shark

What is popularity called "YOGA" today is actually rooted in West Central Afrika. The Yoruba refers to it as "R\xcdR\xd3". This means " ELASTICITY ". Also called " Lati Ro(To be elastic).
— Seleeah_Writes\xa9 #EndSarsBrutality# (@Asipita6) December 26, 2020
(West Afrikan Yoga by the Dan Ethnicity in C\xf4te D'Ivoire).
Thread 1/3 pic.twitter.com/iFkvWzyPZx
The Ancient Egyptians Were Writing Around 3100BC....
— Seleeah_Writes\xa9 #EndSarsBrutality# (@Asipita6) December 23, 2020
Thread!!! pic.twitter.com/YAUpigEFIB
SHORT THREAD!!!
— Seleeah_Writes\xa9 #EndSarsBrutality# (@Asipita6) December 18, 2020
We were told that before the Oyinbos came, our ancestors were barbaric, didn't wear clothes, and hopped trees like monkeys, unfortunately, many of us believed.
A lot Of Our Own Beautiful And Great Historical Events And Persons The System Has Failed To Teach Us.
— Seleeah_Writes\xa9 #EndSarsBrutality# (@Asipita6) December 16, 2020
Thread!!!
Idubor, Giant Prince Of Benin Who Could Uproot Palm Trees With His Bare Hands. pic.twitter.com/KJkk9xYGib
OHUN TOHUN BE LEYIN OFFA O JU OJE LO!!
— Seleeah_Writes\xa9 #EndSarsBrutality# (@Asipita6) December 13, 2020
THREAD!! pic.twitter.com/EBiheg2IaV
The Kru Tribe, Tough People That Refused To Be Captured And Taken Away For Slavery.
— Seleeah_Writes\xa9 #EndSarsBrutality# (@Asipita6) December 13, 2020
THREAD!!! pic.twitter.com/ibcX8PXCLZ
More from World
A) If you mean by "legally questionable" either that Senate is barred by constitution from trying an official impeached while in office, or that there are even very strong arguments against it, I have to differ...
Some argue that if the Senate declines to hold a legally questionable, resource-sucking trial, Trump would be getting a free pass. That assumes criminal authorities do nothing and citizens can't be trusted to evaluate. Censure and focus important work?
— Ross Garber (@rossgarber) January 22, 2021
2/10 Constitutional structure, precedent & any fair reading of original intent dictate that argument for jurisdiction is far stronger than argument against. On original intent, see
3/10 If you mean argument against jurisdiction is plausible, sure, it's plausible. It's just weak. In practical fact, Senate can try Trump now, find him guilty & disqualify him from future office if there are sufficient votes. And no court would presume to overturn that result
4/10 b) The argument from resources is awfully hard to take seriously. Fewer than a dozen House members act as Managers for a few weeks. They are staffed, as are Senators hearing case, by folks whose job it is to do stuff like this...
5/10 Yes, Senate floor time will be taken up. But it's past time for us to stop thinking of members of either house as feeble, fluttering, occupants of a nationally-funded convalescent home. There are nearly 500 of these people with 1000s of staff and a bunch of big buildings...
You May Also Like
Week 1 highlights: getting shortlisted for YC W2019🤞, acquiring a premium domain💰, meeting Substack's @hamishmckenzie and Stripe CEO @patrickc 🤩
2/ So what is Brew?
brew / bru : / to make (beer, coffee etc.) / verb: begin to develop 🌱
A place for you to enjoy premium content while supporting your favorite creators. Sort of like a ‘Consumer-facing Patreon’ cc @jackconte
(we’re still working on the pitch)
3/ So, why be so transparent? Two words: launch strategy.
jk 😅 a) I loooove doing something consistently for a long period of time b) limited downside and infinite upside (feedback, accountability, reach).
cc @altimor, @pmarca

4/ https://t.co/GOQJ7LjQ2t domain 🍻
It started with a cold email. Guess what? He was using BuyMeACoffee on his blog, and was excited to hear about what we're building next. Within 2w, we signed the deal at @Escrowcom's SF office. You’re a pleasure to work with @MichaelCyger!
5/ @ycombinator's invite for the in-person interview arrived that evening. Quite a day!
Thanks @patio11 for the thoughtful feedback on our YC application, and @gabhubert for your directions on positioning the product — set the tone for our pitch!

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.