DrVijayMalik_ValueGuru_Checklist
Ist Upd - 05Jul2020

#Thread

A small tribute to @drvijaymalik on the occasion of Guru Purnima🙏

#valueinvesting #stocks
#SalesGrowth #OPM #npm
#CurrentRatio #DebtToEquity
#SSGR #MarginOfSafety #MaxPEtoPay #EarningsYield
#FII
#MaithanAlloy

1n

@drvijaymalik The Final Checklist for Buying Stocks !

Financial Checklist !

Taking Maithan Alloys as Sample Stock !

Tax Payout Shown in 1n (above).

2n
Valuation Checklist !

Earnings Yield > 10Yr G-Sec Yield. Higher the difference better it is.

Max PE to Pay calculated on the basis of Prevailing Current Interest Rate in the Economy (10Yr G-Sec Yield)

3n
Business & Industry Checklist !

10yr Cumulative PAT vs CFO. Ideally both should be similar or CFO may be little higher (Maithan Alloy Example)

Creation of Value for shareholders -
10Yr Increase in Market Cap > 10yr Increase in Retained Earnings (Maithan Alloy Example)

4n
Management Checklist & Other Business Parameters !

Most of this needs to be done manually. Take it as homework🙂

Maithan Alloy FII (1.87%) & Promoter Shareholding(74.99%).

Less FII better it is.

Check Change in Promoter Holding in last 3yrs (insider Buying) in 1n (above)

5n
Margin of Safety !

EY Vs 10yr G-Sec

SSGR > Current & Over a Period Sales Growth. Higher SSGR better it is.

Maithan Alloy SSGR Calculation @drvijaymalik

FCF vs CFO ratio over 7 to 10yrs. Higher the ratio better it is.

MaxPEtoPay - 3n (above)

6n
Please refer below thread from Dr Vijay Malik for details -

https://t.co/P5uR2wc6vD

7n
Missed to post one point in Financial Checklist (2n) above.

If CFO meets outflows of CFI & CFF it would be great.

For Maithan Alloys in FY 2019 CFO is 15 Cr short of meeting the outflow of CFI & CFF.

8n
Credit Rating Checklist !

Credit rating should be min BBB- . It should be improving over the years.

Maithan Alloys is a Net Cash Company667 Cr in Mar 2019

Credit Rating: CARE AA CRISIL AA CARE/CRISIL A1+

9n

More from Screening Stocks Enjoy 'My StressBusters'

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?