API Webinar💊 Q&A with @unseenvalue

Sir Promised 30 mins but ended up giving all of us more than 90 minutes 😁🙏

For unparalleled insights on the API industry🎥

https://t.co/x1U430JKFG

More from Intrinsic Compounding

More from Uvlearnings

Research in CDMO/APIs is never a slam dunk. It may take ages to yield results. CEP filings can be lumpy as a result. As I wrote last year (link below), Hikal has been consistently sacrificing operating profits for a sustainable future. Best is ahead 🎥 🍿

https://t.co/hItmOud8Pm

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?