Conviction | Patience
Asian Paints is the TCS of 'Home Improvement' space
Think in terms of ::
- Sustainability of Leadership over decades
- Sustainability of Consumption Megatrend
- Sustainability of CFO and Governance
- Quality of Balance Sheet
Rather than absolute MCap
Conviction | Patience
— Sajal Kapoor (@unseenvalue) December 30, 2019
TCS of CDMO in the making over the next 15Y \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Compounding @ 25% since the IPO.
Syngene | Revisit 2030-2040 https://t.co/PHd8UEod5X
More from Sajal Kapoor
Tail-events generate the biggest panic and upside. If you survive the panic w/o jumping off the train, you deserve the 100x in few stocks.
Temperament + Business Analysis = ⤴️
@unseenvalue Hats off Sir. I compared an equal weighted portfolio of your stocks above to the 2 Coffee Can stocks Abbott & Divis and your portfolio has delivered significant upside since then
— ML4TradingDoctor (@DrKRIndia) May 16, 2021
Key has to be conviction and equal weighting pic.twitter.com/6dJ1LDMSYr
Twitter should be like that airport shuttle service, the moment you walk out (start following someone) - there should be a chauffeur (new stock idea) ready to drive you to your destination!
[Free CDMO Masterclass #18] https://t.co/208eQbYKEF
[Free Art of Investing] https://t.co/bHvUqnpiTE
[Paid IIC Dec 2020 on SeQuent] https://t.co/3iDO438Et9
[Charity fund raise on Unseen Trends in Biotechnology] https://t.co/eNi1x1qwhH
[Q&A on APIs]
@unseenvalue Given high capex/opex cost structures of US/Japan/EU, how will they be able to compete with Indian API companies? https://t.co/OYhC2PUZpL
— Hiren (@hiren_investing) August 11, 2021
It's amazing \U0001f60a 25% NP
— Avinash (@Aviral_Bharat) February 17, 2022
$8b revenue
$2b Profit
$92b MCap
At 11 times revenue, it seems to be cheap compared to\U0001f609
More from Uvlearnings
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.