#SeQuent_2 was my 3rd and final warning ⚠️
Long story short :: If you follow someone - make sure you do actually 'follow' ...
When the focus is on capability, terminal value and ESOPs - reported earnings recovery would have to wait. No science. No commerce. Pure basics 😏
Stock traded at 336.50 on 29 June. #Oversmart money was looking at limit-up closing followed by a next day gap up opening to make an annualized CAGR of 5000%
— Conviction | Patience (@unseenvalue) June 30, 2021
Animal spirits! - Lag Gaye \U0001f606 https://t.co/Cew044YHmK
More from Conviction | Patience
Twitter should be like that airport shuttle service, the moment you walk out (start following someone) - there should be a chauffeur (new stock idea) ready to drive you to your destination!
[Free CDMO Masterclass #18] https://t.co/208eQbYKEF
[Free Art of Investing] https://t.co/bHvUqnpiTE
[Paid IIC Dec 2020 on SeQuent] https://t.co/3iDO438Et9
[Charity fund raise on Unseen Trends in Biotechnology] https://t.co/eNi1x1qwhH
[Q&A on APIs]
Never Knowingly Misguide.
Money making and fake advisory/PMS propaganda has never been my agenda
In just 15 years, #LaurusLabs has scaled up like no other..!
— Conviction | Patience (@unseenvalue) July 5, 2020
Numbers v Narrative: Well balanced 2800 Cr sales + huge competitive advantage in terms of IP/patents/synthesis capability!
Comparing Laurus with others - 1 hrs 28 mins\U0001f447https://t.co/Zzx6AwHZLH
Conviction | Patience pic.twitter.com/I6bImfjDCW
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.