It is past due time we talk about microaggressions on interviews (a thread #MedTwitter #AcademicTwitter):
First, microaggressions are harmful! Despite their name, they signal “you don’t belong here” to marginalized groups.
Second, interview days are already nerve-wrecking.
I didn’t have an opportunity to report most. When I shared once, I was told how the person had a “good heart” and is a leader so nothing can be done. Message received: power matters more than my hurt.
More from Twitter
Inside: Privacy Without Monopoly; Broad Band; $50T moved from America's 90% to the 1%; and more!
Archived at: https://t.co/QgK8ZMRKp7
#Pluralistic
1/

This weekend, I'm participating in Boskone 58, Boston's annual sf convention.
https://t.co/2LfFssVcZQ
Tonight, on a panel called "Tech Innovation? Does Silicon Valley Have A Mind-Control Ray, Or a Monopoly?" at 530PM Pacific.
2/

Privacy Without Monopoly: A new EFF white paper, co-authored with Bennett Cyphers.
https://t.co/TVzDXt6bz6
3/

Today, @EFF published "Privacy Without Monopoly: Data Protection and Interoperability," a major new paper by Bennett Cyphers and me. https://t.co/Ma2FE2vZ9u
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) February 13, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/RzCkQdQRxy
Broad Band: Claire L Evans's magesterial history of women in computing.
https://t.co/Lwrej6zVYd
4/

One of the most Monkey's Paw things about my life is my relationship to books. When I was a teenager, I read all the way through the school and public libraries, spent everything I had on books, and still couldn't get enough and dreamt of more.
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) February 13, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/Lgkdk5a7YA
$50T moved from America's 90% to the 1%: The hereditary meritocracy is in crisis.
https://t.co/TquaxOmPi8
5/

Inequality requires narrative stabilizers. When you have too little and someone else has more than they can possibly use, simple logic dictates that you should take what they have.
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) February 13, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/BUFyq9H2n4
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.