oh where do I start.

You have every right to share your frustration & outrage towards the impeachment. You still would’ve been wrong, I would’ve criticized you for downplaying our attack on the capitol, etc. But you went further, you compared Trump to Jesus.

Trumps loss, drove these pastors crazy and mad. For 4 years they lived a fantasy and tolerated Trumps immorality, corruption, hatred, racism, anti-life and much more his whole presidency. Scandal after scandal. They built their faith around Trump being called by God and when
Trump lost, it broke them. They didn’t know what they would tell their followers that they were wrong and God allowed this. Some sobered up, many live in denial but some like Franklin, sold their soul for power. They preach a false God and Jesus. They compared Trump to Jesus.
As dangerous Trump has become, Trump is Trump and we expected this. But Franklin, we didn’t. He went against everything he ever taught and preached. He wanted to become greater than his father and be America’s pastor. He wanted to be America’s pope. He was hungry for power.
Trumps loss broke him. I thought Franklin would’ve taken the high road and excepted the reality of Trump being a failure and needed to apologize for the incitement of an insurrection he started. Trump being impeached twice and a few rep. doing the right thing, drove him crazy.
He couldn’t betray his messiah (Trump) so he rebuked these 10 republicans for not staying in line. For not bowing down to pharaoh and likened their betrayal to Jesus, that somehow Pelosi made a deal with them for them to go rogue, likening them to Judas betraying Jesus.
What Franklin did, angered the Holy Spirit, angered God and angered Jesus. Franklin turned Trump into Jesus and made him his messiah. Franklin lost his way and needs to repent. Sad thing, I dont know if he will ever return back. It’s rare when I classify anyone as false.
But Franklin is not only a false pastor/evangelist, he’s probably, the most dangerous Christian I know. At least for Trump he lets you know who he is, for Franklin, he hides his hate, his white supremacy, his racism his nationalism, his idolatry. All to appear as”holy”.
What am I saying? Between Trump & Franklin, Trump tells & shows us he’s dangerous and he doesn’t care, Franklin, hides it. He doesn’t want you to know he’s a fraud, who’s failed to live to his dads standards and beyond. Franklin hunger for power, was to be greater than his dad
Franklin wanted to become the greatest evangelist America ever knew. But his pride & hunger for earthly power will come with a cost. Just like Trump, he will fail & have a major exposure. Everything that is hidden will come to the light. Franklin..... repent.

Thank you.
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Trump

Allow me to offer some commentary on several SCOTUS cases that are NOT the #moab, but which, considered in aggregate, will reveal my impressions on the #TRUMPSMASH #lawOfFunny

Can someone give me a google number or something? I want a party line.

https://t.co/SlJCsjWMUa


I'm sorry, but #lawOFFunny #nominologicaldeterminism.

#thomists


This one is important:
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Stop saying "it's not censorship if it's not the government"; Trump's swamp gators find corporate refuge; and more!

Archived at: https://t.co/7JMcAbaULj

#Pluralistic

1/


Monday night, I'll be helping William Gibson launch the paperback edition of his novel AGENCY at a Strand Bookstore videoconference. Come say hi!

https://t.co/k3fvBdqOK0

2/


Stop saying "it's not censorship if it's not the government": I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition.

https://t.co/7I0MpCTez5

3/


Trump's swamp gators find corporate refuge: The Swamped project.

https://t.co/MUJyIOr2iw

4/


#15yrsago A-Hole bill would make a secret technology into the law of the land https://t.co/57bJaM1Byr

#15yrsago Hollywood’s MP loses the election — hit the road, Sam! https://t.co/12ssYpV46B

#15yrsago How William Gibson discovered science fiction https://t.co/MYR0go37nW

5/
To those who want to actually help Claudia Conway after her mom (Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s former aide) posted her underage daughter’s nudes to Fleets, fill out a report on the NCMEC CyberTipline.
CPS refused to help her.
#HelpClaudia


Kellyanne Conway has a well-documented history of verbally abusing, gaslighting, and threatening her daughter. It gets worse when highly public things go viral (such as exposing the truth about Trump and Conway catching COVID-19 last October). Kellyanne coerces false statements.

Insider did a thorough chronological background of the history of exposing her parents abuse and control of her here:
https://t.co/ncjaEyLOSC

We all know that “statement” last year was coerced. She talks constantly about being abused by them.


Personally? I suspect Kellyanne is a narcissist. From my own experience being sexually and emotionally abused by a narcissist, they are obsessed with controlling the narrative (coerced typed statement), discrediting their victim (posting her nudes) & gaslighting

If you haven’t experienced gaslighting or aren’t familiar with it, it’s when someone causing you harm (physical, emotional, sexual, financial, etc) twists the facts and asserts that reality is just you being delusional and you don’t actually understand what happened.

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x