Trump's border record: A brief, incomplete history w. links and numbers. Thread -->
https://t.co/iEpykHtkcW
https://t.co/HjGJKRRybN
https://t.co/HZDm3KfiNv
https://t.co/zYgeySWdYL
https://t.co/gUEvWKv9Mi
https://t.co/41Q6VCE2eh
https://t.co/zuYIdn9ULI
https://t.co/4FdmAU1yZH
https://t.co/cghhstGOYe
https://t.co/iDysgY3n1B
https://t.co/dHLq5N0Klb
https://t.co/YZaKCwXJ6i
https://t.co/cSA7Pg8OjW
Our latest metering report found that 8 months into the pandemic, there are still 15,000+ asylum seekers on seven waitlists across the border. However, many individuals have returned home, left for other Mexican cities, or crossed into the US. @Sleuterthttps://t.co/106w2Y0WGs
— Savitri Arvey (@SavitriArvey) December 1, 2020
https://t.co/AWF3PGStNE
https://t.co/zjlZh2SKZ5
omg, here's the latest numbers by Morgan:
— tanvi (@Tanvim) February 27, 2020
MPP: 59000
ENV: 17000
PACR: 2500
ACA: 1,000
HARP: 1200
https://t.co/LTwzyNPTMq
!! Senator Sinema provides brand new statistics showing the extreme lack of representation in the PACR & HARP programs, which rush migrants through asylum screenings:
— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) September 23, 2020
"Only 13 of over 2,000 HARP cases and only 18 of over 2,700 PACR cases have had a legal representative."
https://t.co/IQJQjKtK0f
https://t.co/wCcExdI8tI
https://t.co/PlTJA1WQ3S
See: 1) https://t.co/RGIhq17laP
2) https://t.co/3SYScJ30nO
Morgan just said all unaccompanied children are being screened per TVPRA (trafficking protection) requirements- even under Title 42.....in response to @SenJackyRosen
— tanvi (@Tanvim) June 25, 2020
's question.
But there's plenty of reporting to suggest otherwise. See: this by @itscaitlinhd
https://t.co/XRxvhJNa98
Morgan keeps saying that Title 42 is not an immigration enforcement tool, but there's s lot of reporting that Miller had been wanting to shut down the border way before the pandemic
— tanvi (@Tanvim) August 6, 2020
https://t.co/b1eIPo3ZCl
https://t.co/Oc9OrbNdAD
More from Trump
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?