There are certain indicators, levels, or other ways you can increase your odds of being right >50%, but you'll never get significantly higher
You always hear people let your winners ride or cut your losers early. Easier said than done, right?
Well, it's a mathematical fact that implementing this will improve your trading profits
The math behind leaving runners on and cutting losers early 👇👇👇
There are certain indicators, levels, or other ways you can increase your odds of being right >50%, but you'll never get significantly higher
You HAVE to let your winners run and cut your losers early.
Example: you take 100 trades for $100. Winners win $10, losers lose $10. To profit, you need 51 winners (+$510) and 49 losers (-$490)
Example: you take 100 trades for $100. Winners win $20, losers lose $5. To profit, you need 21 winners (+$420) and 79 losers (-$395)
You can essentially lose 4 out of every 5 trades and still make money if you simply let your winners run and cut your losers
2:1 (winners run 20%, losers stopped out at 10%), you only need to win 34%
3:1, 26%
4:1, 21%
You decrease the # of trades you need to hit by having your winners outweigh your losers
1) Have a rule on your stop losses. Personally, every trade I enter I immediately set a STOP order for -10%
2) Have a target profit level for winners. For me, I like the 2:1 risk/reward so once a trade hits 20% profits, I start to scale out
So when my trade hits 20%, I scale out part of my position and move my stop order for the rest to 10% profits
Remember, YOU CAN ALWAYS RE-ENTER.
1) Your thesis of it breaking the level is no longer valid
2) If it breaks above the level again, you can just re-enter
Special thanks to @AdamSliverTrade , @notmrmanziel , @TradingWarz , and the rest of the #LDL crew for getting me on this path and helping inform threads like this
More from Tradingthread
1. https://t.co/cWGjheFrdL
I\u2019m going to do a thread on \u201cDD\u201d. Due diligence is everything about investing. There\u2019s no wrong way to do DD, but I\u2019m going to show a few things I do in order to finding a company that I believe in. Also mix in what others do as well!
— Yates Investing (@yatesinvesting) May 16, 2020
2. https://t.co/tgJO7riEYH
Tonight I want to discuss \u201cGap Fills\u201d I was asked the other day what I meant, so I decided to do this thread.
— Yates Investing (@yatesinvesting) May 14, 2020
3. OFFERINGS
Alright, so tonight i\u2019m going to discuss offerings. I\u2019m also going to discuss why I think offerings are easy money makers. It\u2019s one of my trading strategies, but don\u2019t think that means you need to go buy every stock that has an offering. This might be long. Let\u2019s get started....
— Yates Investing (@yatesinvesting) May 12, 2020
4. OPTIONS and WARRANTS
Let\u2019s learn the difference between stock options and stock warrants real quick.
— Yates Investing (@yatesinvesting) May 12, 2020
Also want to go over option trading more.
his content from the playlist start with "how to read stock charts". It's precise and on point and short enough for you to get through this week even if you did one video tonight .. I like his teaching method .. he's slow and very easy to understand
As for DD. It comes from many factors. Mainly the trading platform itself has updated news posted on the ticker you want to trade.
https://t.co/1f8wQs1LcA
Really liking this website it has breakdown of the financials & summary of SEC filings. (con'd)
Also a whole bunch of other stuff that it focuses on the companies that you search. As for what I look for?
10-K & 10-Q.
Read 8Ks ..company updates
Also look to see if they did an recent Offerings (S-4 filings)
Also look to see S-3 filings for upcoming dilutions.
cont'd
https://t.co/nxP0hAJ4UH (Great place for quick articles on many stocks that are posted by analysts who do very good work digging info)
https://t.co/KsYqlmTlQ8 for quick news info
https://t.co/v5xGZqWhbn For constant world news
You May Also Like
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Project: Lifelog
— Robert Horan (@Robby12692) December 13, 2018
Started by DARPA in 1999, the goal of Lifelog was to create a database on civilians without their knowledge, and track everything they do.
The project "ended" on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook began the exact same day.
The CIA funneled tens of millions into Facebook. pic.twitter.com/r7hwF0v9kh
Pentagon Kills LifeLog
Stan Lee, who died Monday at 95, was born in Manhattan and graduated from DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx. His pulp-fiction heroes have come to define much of popular culture in the early 21st century.
Tying Marvel’s stable of pulp-fiction heroes to a real place — New York — served a counterbalance to the sometimes gravity-challenged action and the improbability of the stories. That was just what Stan Lee wanted. https://t.co/rDosqzpP8i
The New York universe hooked readers. And the artists drew what they were familiar with, which made the Marvel universe authentic-looking, down to the water towers atop many of the buildings. https://t.co/rDosqzpP8i
The Avengers Mansion was a Beaux-Arts palace. Fans know it as 890 Fifth Avenue. The Frick Collection, which now occupies the place, uses the address of the front door: 1 East 70th Street.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.