$TSLAQ Instead of having an accrual palooza, I will dribble these out as I have time and available information. The first account to be reviewed: Automotive Leasing Revenues. The remainder of the planet calls this Sales-Type Leasing (ASC 842.) (1/n)

GAAP allows revenue recognition if a manufacture or dealer leases the preponderance of useful life and economic value of inventory. Computer manufactures are significant users of this accounting treatment. The journal entries for this type of leasing are: (2/n)
The sales are the present value of the payments plus down payment. COGS is the cost of the equipment less the present value of the residual payment. (3/n)
The final receivable entry is the residual value added to the lease payment receivable to remove inventory from the financial statements. $TSLA classifies the lease receivable as an Operating Lease Vehicles, net on the balance sheet and they are subject to depreciation. (4/n)
The assumptions in the calculation that can be subject to manipulation: the implicit interest rate of the lease and the residual payments. Lower rates increase capitalization of the lease which gives higher revenues. Larger residual decreases cost of goods sold. (5/n)
I have done this calculation every quarter since 12/31/19 and posted on twitter. To simplify the understanding of the problem, I calculated the implicit rate of the leases. (6/n)
The down payments do not have a time value of money issue (I.E. – there is no time.) The future payments are TVM. Remember the revenue calculation? Present value of the lease payments plus down payment. (7/n)
Look at Q1 & Q2 2020. We can debate if a lease implicit rate of 1.29%, 1.93% or 3.20% are realistic (Q4 19, Q3 20 & Q4 20). But negative rates in Q1 & Q2? (8/n)
If you want a common sense validation, look at the number of units leased for those two quarters (6,104 & 4,806) compared to revenues (239m & 268m.) Yep, revenues increased in a period where the units leased fell. (9/n)
Which brings the most important point: someone went to the principles’ office in Q3. Equally important, I have no idea who the principle might be (SEC, Board or External Audit). (10/n)

More from Trading

You May Also Like

Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.