It's a public company, so you could go on your broker's website and trade its stock. Its price had been low for a while.
THREAD: What are some Posting Traders doing, and what do the federal securities laws say about it? A securities law professor tries to make it simple.
(Tl;dr? Some people on the Internet will be surprised when the SEC investigates them for market manipulation.)
It's a public company, so you could go on your broker's website and trade its stock. Its price had been low for a while.
Some big hedge funds (think BILLIONS) were betting that it'd go down. This is called a "short" bet.
Note for later: "borrowing" is important.
Compared with someone "short," someone "long" a stock actually has it (kinda).
Shorting is controversial; it puts downward pressure on stock price. Long investors, big (Elon Musk) and small (mom and pop) alike, don't want to lose from low stock prices.
https://t.co/abvqutbusN
Instead of buying or selling the stock, you can buy options—also bets on a stock price going up or down—more cheaply from a big financial institution middleman.
If the price goes up, it eats away at the collateral available to cover the bet if it goes bad. So you have to put up more collateral.
But because stock prices are theoretically limitless, a short investor faces potentially unlimited losses from a bad bet, if the price at which they buy back the stock skyrockets.
In fact, for GameStop there are more shares sold short than there are available to be bought back. So those holding the stock can sell.
1. Buy options to raise stock price.
2. Higher price forces short sellers to put up more margin.
3. Shorts also have to "cover" by buying back at much higher prices.
4. You sell to them at the high price.
5. Maybe destroy hedge fund?
Seems to have worked in the case of Melvin Capital, a hedge fund that had to "cover" its short position and get bailed out by other rich people. (Follow Matt if not already.)
But I'm here to talk about federal securities law. (I'm not a NE lawyer and this isn't legal advice.)
The SEC yesterday announced it was aware of all this and is "review[ing] the activities of regulated entities, financial intermediaries, and other market participants."
That last group includes everyone I talked about above short sellers, posters, all.
https://t.co/9KSUhIwXAN
It has the whiff of a pump and dump scheme, when fraudsters drum up support for a worthless stock before selling to dummies. That is undoubtedly the mental model that ENF investigators are trying to fit it in.
— James Fallows Tierney (@JamesFTierney) January 28, 2021
Sound familiar? Look again above at GameStop "strategy" steps 1-4. Can posts show that "purpose"?
https://t.co/O8qIHXzJ2T
But the SEC is undoubtedly looking into it.
Maybe it is or isn't a winning theory. But putting it to the test is costly. The SEC typically has leverage to get its targets to settle.
(The rest of her article, about open market manipulation, is great and worth reading!)
https://t.co/NsxRo3GuVk
More from Trading
1. Core setup
2. Pivot points trades
3. PDH/PDL trades
4. Open interest addictions combined with rejections on charts.
5. Website to confirm bias
Very quick read.
Share if you liked for the benefit of everyone.
•Main setup of @ITRADE191
He used this setup daily for all trades.
1. EMA crossover 10/20
2. Supertrend 10/3
3. Vwap
4. RSI >
@MiteshFan @Mitesh_Engr @Abhishekkar_ MY TRADING SETUP .... I've been using it for a long time .. result good try it \U0001f607 pic.twitter.com/XThUD0ftbl
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) June 13, 2020
•Volume always greater than
Volume Should always be above 20 pic.twitter.com/CPgxLgpPKF
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) June 13, 2020
•Candle Rejecting from
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) August 25, 2020
•Pivot settings
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) October 20, 2020
You May Also Like
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.