A thread about GameStop:

Big hedge funds made big bets that GameStop’s stock was overvalued. The way these bets work is the hedge fund borrows shares of the stock and sells those borrowed shares.

When it comes time to give the borrowed shares back, they buy them on the market, hopefully at lower prices. For example, they might sell the borrowed share at $50, hoping to be able to buy the share back at $30, to make a $20 profit. This is called shorting.
The hedge funds were so sure that GameStop was going down, that GameStop was the most shorted stock on the market. 140% of the shares in existence were “borrowed.” Imagine Bob borrows from Jane who borrows from Sue who borrows from John.
Shorting is risky, but the hedge funds were so sure that they just didn’t even care. People on Reddit realized this and basically thought “what if we all just bought shares and refused to sell them when the hedge funds need to give their borrowed shares back.”
The price goes up, the hedge funds are forced to buy back the expensive shares and lose money. Except the hedge funds kept doubling down as the price rode up, expecting that it would eventually fall. The Redditors weren't scared off and with "diamond hands" refused to sell.
It gets to the point where hedge fund isn’t even big enough to buy back the shares they borrowed because the price is so high. When that happens, they can be “margin called.”
Basically, once they get to the point where they don’t have enough money to pay for the shares they borrowed, their accounts can be liquidated and they can be forced to buy, regardless of what the current price is.
So if a big fund gets margin called, it puts a huge amount of buying pressure on the stock, causing the already high stock price to go even higher. As these funds get margin called, prices shoot up, causing more margin calls. A lot of the funds go bankrupt.
Basically, an army of Redditors “yolo’d” their $1000 accounts not really caring if they lost it all, and in the process brought down giant over-leveraged hedge funds that were betting on GameStop to close and lay off all of their employees. "Together ape strong"
There’s more to it than that. GameStop added the founder of https://t.co/2Oj9bvwHTz to their board and he bought a big stake in the company. A lot of people genuinely thought GameStop was a good long-term stock to buy, and that was part of what started the whole thing.
Now if you turn on CNBC or listen to market analysts, they're all villainizing the Redditors and accusing them or market manipulation. Basically their rich buddies lost their shirts and they're pissed about it.
Everything they did was on a wide open public forum, which is more than you can say for the board rooms that these funds operate in.

More from Trading

TradingView isn't just charts

It's much more powerful than you think

9 things TradingView can do, you'll wish you knew yesterday: 🧵

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

1/ Free Multi Timeframe Analysis

Step 1. Download Vivaldi Browser

Step 2. Login to trading view

Step 3. Open bank nifty chart in 4 separate windows

Step 4. Click on the first tab and shift + click by mouse on the last tab.

Step 5. Select "Tile all 4 tabs"


What happens is you get 4 charts joint on one screen.

Refer to the attached picture.

The best part about this is this is absolutely free to do.

Also, do note:

I do not have the paid version of trading view.


2/ Free Multiple Watchlists

Go through this informative thread where @sarosijghosh teaches you how to create multiple free watchlists in the free


3/ Free Segregation into different headers/sectors

You can create multiple sections sector-wise for free.

1. Long tap on any index/stock and click on "Add section above."
2. Secgregate the stocks/indices based on where they belong.

Kinda like how I did in the picture below.

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".