Do not short any stock which is trading near 52 week or life high ( at least 8-10%).
It will just take 1 day to clear the high again.
Make it simple rule Do not short stock till its trading 10% near 52 week or life high.
#Divis
— Anand Luhar (@anand_luhar) June 10, 2021
Thank you soo much All shorter of #Divis
apke bena aye gain possible he nahi tha
\U0001f64f\U0001f64f\U0001f64f pic.twitter.com/CanXrMwlP9
More from Trendmyfriend
bhai, I don't know what will nifty doing next but I am ready👇
Stock below 10.2 first time after big run - Pelo
Stock hit dc 50 low first time - Pelo
Stock getting rejection from 10.2- Lelo
Stock getting hit dc 50 high- Lelo
fresh maal milega, n move will be sharp n rewarding👍
Stock below 10.2 first time after big run - Pelo
Stock hit dc 50 low first time - Pelo
Stock getting rejection from 10.2- Lelo
Stock getting hit dc 50 high- Lelo
fresh maal milega, n move will be sharp n rewarding👍
On which side, if I may ask
— Surjeet Singh (@er_surjeet25) October 28, 2021
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.