Get ready will Reveal RSI strategy strategy
for quick gain in short time.
Risk Reward Ratio 1:3
For 10-15% in 3 to 5 days or more.
Like, share, retweet for Retailer benefit.
#SwingTrading #superperformer #stocks #StockMarket #stockmarketeducation #stockselection #webinar
More from Stocks
Prashant Sir has a spectacular ability to simplify complex topics and put them in Twitter threads.
📊 This is a must-read for every trader.
I scraped his entire tweet library - here are some of my faves.
THREAD 🧵 👇
1/7
Bollinger
Thread: Bollinger Bands
— Prashant Shah (@Prashantshah267) August 22, 2020
Bollinger Bands\xae is a wonderful invention of John Bollinger. #Bollingerbands #Indicators #Definedge pic.twitter.com/UREE7eedxh
2/7
Donchian
Thread: Donchian Channels
— Prashant Shah (@Prashantshah267) August 8, 2020
Donchian channels were invented by Richard Donchian. He is known as a father of trend following trading. He was founder of world\u2019s first managed fund in 1949. #donchianchannels #indicators #definedge pic.twitter.com/IaTcGedIbR
3/7
Darvas
Thread: Darvas Box Theory#Darvas #knowledgesharing #Definedge pic.twitter.com/xYRrlkjDrm
— Prashant Shah (@Prashantshah267) July 17, 2020
4/7
Money Flow Index or
Thread: MFI Indicator
— Prashant Shah (@Prashantshah267) July 24, 2020
Created by Gene Quong and Avrum Soudack, MFI stands for Money Flow Index. #MFI #Indicators #Definedge pic.twitter.com/zZPU4SUuEu
You May Also Like
Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)
I interviewed 5 billionaires this week
— GREG ISENBERG (@gregisenberg) January 23, 2021
I asked them to share their lessons learned on startups, life and entrepreneurship:
Here's what they told me:
10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)
To outperform, you need serious competitive advantages.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) March 20, 2021
But contrary to what you have been told, most of them don't require talent.
10 competitive advantages that you can start developing today:
Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)
I\u2019ve gotten a lot of bad advice in my career and I see even more of it here on Twitter.
— Nick Huber (@sweatystartup) January 3, 2021
Time for a stiff drink and some truth you probably dont want to hear.
\U0001f447\U0001f447
10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)
THREAD: 10 significant lies you're told about the world.
— Julian Shapiro (@Julian) January 9, 2021
On startups, writing, and your career:
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?