"Despite the effects of the pandemic on overall car use, SUVs consumed more oil last year than they did in 2019"
2/
THREAD: Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs)
Global car sales shrank by ~14% in 2020
* Sales of electric cars grew ~50% (from a very low level)
* Sales of SUVs declined ~10%, but share of sales went from 39% to 42%
→ What about emissions from SUVs?
1/
https://t.co/WBN3Lup2hU
"Despite the effects of the pandemic on overall car use, SUVs consumed more oil last year than they did in 2019"
2/
"Remarkably, we estimate that the increase in the overall SUV fleet in 2020 cancelled out the declines in oil consumption by SUVs that resulted from Covid-related lockdown measures"
3/
"Emissions from SUVs have nearly tripled over the past decade"
4/
5/
6/
7/
8/
https://t.co/WBN3Lup2hU
9/9
More from Sport
When thinking about who to play in DM for Leeds the word "role" is important. Let's have a think about the role:
A lot of people think Struijk isn't good enough in the build-up phase. Well, what does the DM do in build-up?
Here's a passing network from last season:
As you can see, Phillips' role in the Championship last season was largely facilitating build up in the wide area (on the left interestingly).
Per Wyscout, Phillips is putting up a figure of 7.03 long passes per 90 minutes and completes around 59%. Last season he was making 6.94 long passes per 90 mins at around 52%.
Per dribbles he's putting up similar numbers across both seasons (between 1 and 1.5 p90) and per duels he's putting up the same number (20 p90).
All of this suggests his role hasn't changed much over the last couple of seasons.
This exactly. I think the 8 and fullback roles in this system share quite a lot of common attributes, even forgetting how Bielsa looks to hybrid them in 3-3-1-3. No wonder that we've seen Dallas, Shackleton, Gotts etc play both. And these roles play to Dallas' strengths.
— Jacob Standbridge (@PocketTrumpeter) February 13, 2021
A lot of people think Struijk isn't good enough in the build-up phase. Well, what does the DM do in build-up?
Here's a passing network from last season:
As you can see, Phillips' role in the Championship last season was largely facilitating build up in the wide area (on the left interestingly).
Per Wyscout, Phillips is putting up a figure of 7.03 long passes per 90 minutes and completes around 59%. Last season he was making 6.94 long passes per 90 mins at around 52%.
Per dribbles he's putting up similar numbers across both seasons (between 1 and 1.5 p90) and per duels he's putting up the same number (20 p90).
All of this suggests his role hasn't changed much over the last couple of seasons.
It's Sunday, Fed blackout, am recovering from soccer match, sipping on double espresso, so of course a perfect time to take on Tyler Cowen here. 🙂
Like many people, I enjoy reading Tyler's blog. But there are times (alright, many times) I disagree with him. This is no big deal. I also disagree with myself sometimes (especially my past self). But his recent post left me
What is he trying to say here? After thinking about it for a bit, I think he's critiquing the idea that "running the economy hot" leads to employment *and* real wage gains. Perhaps the former, but only at the expense of the latter. At least, this is what a textbook IS-LM model
tells us if one "runs the economy hot" through increased fiscal stimulus (on consumption and transfers, not public infrastructure investment). If this is what he meant, then he should have just said so, instead of labeling this a "Keynesian" proposition.
In fact, this property follows as a *neoclassical* proposition that is embedded in the IS-LM framework. (For non-economists, note that Keynes did not invent IS-LM; the framework was developed later by Hicks as an interpretation of *some* parts of the General Theory.)
It is hardly phony, especially on social media, to refer to IS-LM models and the like as \u201cKeynesian.\u201d Krugman pushing it and, for better or worse, rising in popularity.
— tylercowen (@tylercowen) January 17, 2021
Like many people, I enjoy reading Tyler's blog. But there are times (alright, many times) I disagree with him. This is no big deal. I also disagree with myself sometimes (especially my past self). But his recent post left me
What is he trying to say here? After thinking about it for a bit, I think he's critiquing the idea that "running the economy hot" leads to employment *and* real wage gains. Perhaps the former, but only at the expense of the latter. At least, this is what a textbook IS-LM model
tells us if one "runs the economy hot" through increased fiscal stimulus (on consumption and transfers, not public infrastructure investment). If this is what he meant, then he should have just said so, instead of labeling this a "Keynesian" proposition.
In fact, this property follows as a *neoclassical* proposition that is embedded in the IS-LM framework. (For non-economists, note that Keynes did not invent IS-LM; the framework was developed later by Hicks as an interpretation of *some* parts of the General Theory.)
It's time for the NBA Math player power rankings heading into games on Jan. 4!
As always, these are based solely on our Rolling Player Ratings, which are determined by performance over a player's last 10 appearances:
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
Only the last 10 games matter, and players must have played in the last week to maintain eligibility.
25. Anthony Davis, Los Angeles Lakers: 18.26
24. Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics: 18.35
23. Damian Lillard, Portland Trail Blazers: 18.39
22. Collin Sexton, Cleveland Cavaliers: 18.77
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
21. Paul George, Los Angeles Clippers: 18.77
20. Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks: 18.84
19. DeMar DeRozan, San Antonio Spurs: 18.89
18. Malcolm Brogdon, Indiana Pacers: 19.04
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
17. Domantas Sabonis, Indiana Pacers: 19.13
16. Nikola Vucevic, Orlando Magic: 19.46
15. Trae Young, Atlanta Hawks: 19.33
14. Jamal Murray, Denver Nuggets: 19.64
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
As always, these are based solely on our Rolling Player Ratings, which are determined by performance over a player's last 10 appearances:
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
Only the last 10 games matter, and players must have played in the last week to maintain eligibility.
25. Anthony Davis, Los Angeles Lakers: 18.26
24. Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics: 18.35
23. Damian Lillard, Portland Trail Blazers: 18.39
22. Collin Sexton, Cleveland Cavaliers: 18.77
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
21. Paul George, Los Angeles Clippers: 18.77
20. Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks: 18.84
19. DeMar DeRozan, San Antonio Spurs: 18.89
18. Malcolm Brogdon, Indiana Pacers: 19.04
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
17. Domantas Sabonis, Indiana Pacers: 19.13
16. Nikola Vucevic, Orlando Magic: 19.46
15. Trae Young, Atlanta Hawks: 19.33
14. Jamal Murray, Denver Nuggets: 19.64
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
