![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabtqpVgAARR_B.jpg)
So ICC declared Virat Kohli as the Captain of their test team of the decade.
I have made an attempt to go through his series wise journey as the test captain and have attempted to do a critical analysis of his achievements, failures and challenges for the future.
Please enjoy
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqabs6JUUAAsqbB.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabtqpVgAARR_B.jpg)
The numbers are approximately because I am a B grade stats digger 🤪
The only match resulted in a draw because of rain. Indian Openers Vijay and Dhawan piled 150+ each to make India reach 462-6. India bowled out BD at a low score and made them follow-on. Ashwin claimed a fifer and started his era of dominance.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabucnU0AAVGch.jpg)
India won the series 2-1. It was first series win in SL after a gap of 22 years. While it may seem to be an easy series, it was a story of dominant comeback after losing the 1st match.
Ashwin was given MOS for his 21 wickets.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqabu2xU8AADTGR.jpg)
India won the series 3-0 denying any victory to the visiting south African team. It was a top notch SA team captained by Ab de Villiers joined by Amla, Faf, Duminy, Styen, Morkel, Imran Tahir etc.
Ashwin was given MOS for his 31 wickets.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabvulU8AYzTnH.jpg)
India won the series 2-0 with the scoreline of WDWD. India got an opener in KL Rahul who scored impressive runs for the 2 matches he got as an opener. Virat scored his first double century and ofcourse Ashwin was MOS for his 17 wickets.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabwswVoAIfTqY.jpg)
India whitewashed NZ by 3-0. Virat scored double hundred number 2 while Pujara, Rahane, Rohit found them among runs. Ashwin was the MOS for his 27 wickets in 3 matches. Virat received the ICC test championship mace and India got the Rank 1 😊
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabxgMVQAAUzBC.jpg)
India won 4-0 by DWWWW scoreline. This humiliation was the damage control of 2011 series when Eng whitewashed us on ours by 4-0.
MOS Virat scored 655 runs with another 200, Ashwin took 28 wickets, Nair scored a 300 and Rahul got out at 199.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabytNVQAAL3Ui.jpg)
This was first test series of Virat as an all format captain. Madman Virat scored his 4th double hundred in the 4th consecutive series. India scored a mammoth 687 runs and had a thumping victory. Captain bagged his Man of the Match Award.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqabzRnUYAASeok.jpg)
India lost the first match but then displayed great character by winning the series 2-1 with scoreline of LWDW.
KL Rahul dominated by series by scoring 6 50s in 7 innings. Ravi was the MOS for his 25 wickets, not Ravi Ashwin but Ravi Jadeja.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqabz-LUUAIy_zA.jpg)
It was a thumping whitewash where India won two matches by innings margin and one by 300 runs.
It was Hardik Pandya's test debut where he scored his century too. Dhawan, who came in for injured KL Rahul, won the Man of Series.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab0k6UYAAzGMA.jpg)
The rain stuck series ended in 1-0 in favour of India. Virat scored mammoth 610 runs with 2 double centuries and a 100 for which he got Man of Series. India made a world record of most successive series win equalling Australia's record of 9.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab1T6VoAAQUB_.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab2UyU0AANidK.jpg)
India lose the series 2-1, but what the scoreline wouldn't show is that it was one hell of a top fight. India lost by narrow margins due to the batsmen not able to chase well in the 4th innings. We couldn't achieve the target of 207 and 286.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab2shUUAEk2ER.jpg)
The wolf pack took all 60 wickets of SA, where 50 wickets were taken by fast bowlers. Bumrah took 14 in his debut tour.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab3RFUwAAE_Wg.jpg)
India lost the series 4-1, only winning the last dead rubber. Yet the series was very closely fought in 2 matches that India lost by 31 & 60 runs only.
The wolf pack took 85 wickets in 9 innings with the Pacers taking 61 of them.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab33hVoAAUKgd.jpg)
Rishabh Pant scored 100 in his debut series along with KL.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab4QEUYAEIWWN.jpg)
India won both the matches hands down. Highlight of the tour was the young debutant opener, Prithvi Shaw. Kid scored a century on his debut and ammased 237 runs in 3 innings at an average of 118 and thus winning Man of the Series award.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab4nrUcAAEqKe.jpg)
Ah! No words can do justice to the joy of winning 2-1 against Aus in Aus. This happened for the first time in the 71 years history of both teams playing. Gavaskar had tears in his eyes, Shastri said it's no less than winning a world cup.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab5PHUcAAb310.jpg)
The Australian bowling was exactly the same to what it is now. Nothing can reduce the significance of the special win.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab5ygVEAExuPz.jpg)
The wolf pack took all 70 wickets in the 7 innings with the fast bowlers taking 50. Remembering the scenes still gives goosebumps.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqab6IHUwAAC02S.jpg)
Visiting WI, just after the World Cup heart break, India easily won both the test matches in WI. It was a first ever clean sweep done by India in West Indies. Vihari scored a good hundred and so did Rahane
Pacers took 33 out of all 40 wickets
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqacJDuU0AA5rW1.jpg)
At this point it starts to sound absolutely ridiculous the way India has become invincible at home. They thrash SA by a 30 margin while Mayank, Rohit and Virat scoring 200+ each.
The 60 wickets were shared by spinners and pacers equally 👀
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqacWTDVoAcCka5.jpg)
Winning both the tests by the margin of innings, India became the first team to do so in 4 continuous matches.
Mayank scored yet another 200 and Virat scored a 100 in the pink ball test.
The pacers were found to be picking 33/40 wickets.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqadkZ6UYAAVqLF.jpg)
As 2020 has been for most of the people, India got cleen sweeped for the first time under Virat Kohli.
Rohit couldn't turn up for what was supposed to be his real test, due to an injury. All other batsmen fell short of performance too.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqadxM6UcAIxKmS.jpg)
Series - Played 18, Won 14
Home - Played 9, Won 9
Away - Played 9, Won 5
With almost 58 % wins, he stands just marginally behind Waugh, Ponting and Bradman only.
Maybe now it's time to see what's the story behind these numbers. Jump in!
• Bringing in the 20 wickets mentality
• Forming a lethal pace attack
• Becoming invincible at home
• Making WI & SL equal to home
• Putting great fights in SENA
• Induction of Bumrah & Pandya
• Developing a pool of bowlers
• Setting up leadership template
• Not finding stable opening pair
• Non success of KL Rahul
• Being stuck at Saha who can't bat
• Being very weak in 4th innings
• Poor ability to clean up the tails
• Not having enouh batting reserves
• Not taking a firm decision on Rohit
More from Sport
A (long) thread on why Andrew is correct but ultimately incorrect…
Andrew is correct at the neurological level. The cognitive and ecological explanations of the brain and behaviour are completely different. Saying you’re an eclectic coach at this level is like saying you
believe the earth is round and flat. It’s simply not possible.
You CANNOT say that in one activity you are helping players build representations/memory (cognitive) and in another activity you’re helping players attune to specifying information in the environment (ecological).
No matter how much we scream eclecticism, at the neurological level Andrew is correct. But after this Andrew is incorrect.
He is basing his critique of an ‘it depends’ stance at a neurological ‘representations vs information’ level (see his thread). But this isn’t the level that
‘it depends’ functions (in a coaching context). ‘It depends’ exists at the behavioural level (certainly not the neurological level). ‘It depends’ relates to decision making around individual and group differences, as well as context. Coaching, by and large, is about helping
people manage and change behaviour – how a coach does this will ‘depend’ on a number of individual, group and contextual factors. That is the most important level of coaching and we don’t have to go to the neurological level to deliver efficaciously and effectively
Andrew is correct at the neurological level. The cognitive and ecological explanations of the brain and behaviour are completely different. Saying you’re an eclectic coach at this level is like saying you
Many coaches advocate for picking and choosing methods from a variety of theoretical camps, on the premise that which is best \u2018depends\u2019 on the player, the coach, etc and you want the biggest toolkit you can get.
— Andrew D Wilson (@PsychScientists) November 27, 2020
I think this is an error, which I will now attempt to defend
believe the earth is round and flat. It’s simply not possible.
You CANNOT say that in one activity you are helping players build representations/memory (cognitive) and in another activity you’re helping players attune to specifying information in the environment (ecological).
No matter how much we scream eclecticism, at the neurological level Andrew is correct. But after this Andrew is incorrect.
He is basing his critique of an ‘it depends’ stance at a neurological ‘representations vs information’ level (see his thread). But this isn’t the level that
‘it depends’ functions (in a coaching context). ‘It depends’ exists at the behavioural level (certainly not the neurological level). ‘It depends’ relates to decision making around individual and group differences, as well as context. Coaching, by and large, is about helping
people manage and change behaviour – how a coach does this will ‘depend’ on a number of individual, group and contextual factors. That is the most important level of coaching and we don’t have to go to the neurological level to deliver efficaciously and effectively
You May Also Like
The first area to focus on is diversity. This has become a dogma in the tech world, and despite the fact that tech is one of the most meritocratic industries in the world, there are constant efforts to promote diversity at the expense of fairness, merit and competency. Examples:
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DsfuketX4AA4kp_.jpg)