Over 70 former professional rugby players are preparing for legal action against the sport’s governing bodies according to this report.

The group litigation seems to be in its early stages, but World Rugby & Unions will be starting to get twitchy.

THREAD on the key issues 👇🏼

1) Duty of care

Do the governing bodies (World Rugby, RFU, WRU etc) owe players a duty of care in respect of their health and safety? The answer is almost certainly yes (see for example Watson v BBBoC).
2) Breach of duty

Have the governing bodies breached this duty? This is the first of the major hurdles for any litigation.

The question is essentially whether they acted reasonably in the circumstances.

Did they know about the dangers of concussion and fail to act?
Or should they have done more to discover the dangers of concussion but failed to do so?

The NFL case was based on the fact that the NFL knew of the dangers and covered them up. I’d suggest that’s unlikely here. However, it may be that WR/Unions should have done more sooner.
Much will depend upon the state of medical/scientific understanding of concussion at the relevant times.

For example, in the early 80s it may be that there was no indication that concussion might cause long-term complications but, by the early 2000s, there was.
3) Causation

The second of the major hurdles. Had WR/the Unions acted sooner, would these players not have suffered these long-term effects?

First, this requires a medical link between concussion and the long-term neurological effects. It seems that this can be established.
However, it also requires consideration of what WR/the Unions should have done.

If we say that they should have introduce an equivalent of the HIA and its associated protocols sooner, would that have stopped the players suffering these long-term consequences?
Or is it the repeated sub-concussive blows that cumulatively cause the harm? Aren’t these inherent to the game? Could WR/the Unions be reasonably to do reduce these? Would that be possible?

Had WR/the Unions acted reasonably, would players still have suffered? It is not clear.
It may be possible to argue that they would not be suffering.

For example, it could be argued that closer monitoring of concussion, concussion substitutes and awareness amongst players etc would have halved the risk of a player suffering long-term effects.
If they can prove this, they may be able to win.

However, this is likely to be the most difficult part, and will require detailed scientific analysis, as well as a clear argument about what exactly WR/the Unions should reasonably have done in the first place.
4) Defences

WR/the Unions might argue that the players consented to the risks of concussion by playing the game - the defence of volenti non fit injuria.

However, given the players’ lack of understanding about the long-term impact and their relative lack of resources...
that argument is unlikely to get very far.

Allowing such a defence here would contradict the duty of care.

Nonetheless, there might be a finding of “contributory negligence” (dependent on facts) which would reduce any award of damages.
5) Limitation

A preliminary issue for players will be whether their claim is time-barred. The Limitation Act says claims must be brought within 3 years of the cause of action accruing, or within 3 years of the date of on which the loss could reasonably have been discovered.
The latter is most likely to be relevant here. Players will have to bring their claim within 3 years of discovering their long-term injury and having a reasonable belief that this was attributable to actions/inaction of WR/the Unions.
6) Damages

If you’re still reading...players will be able to claim compensation for general damages (i.e. pain, suffering and loss of amenity) and special damages (i.e. any financial losses such as lost earnings, medical expenses etc).

Of course, that’s only if they win.
Damages awards in the UK tend to be lower than in the US but, cumulatively, the total could be huge.

Not quite $1bil huge though, I’d imagine...
7) Conclusions

Any claim will face an uphill battle, but it will certainly be a fascinating one. Whether it will even reach a courtroom remains to be seen.

I’ll be trying to write a more detailed analysis for https://t.co/vVdFLTy0YY soon!

#sportslaw #concussion #Rugby

More from Sport

You May Also Like

The chorus of this song uses the shlokas taken from Sundarkand of Ramayana.

It is a series of Sanskrit shlokas recited by Jambavant to Hanuman to remind Him of his true potential.

1. धीवर प्रसार शौर्य भरा: The brave persevering one, your bravery is taking you forward.


2. उतसारा स्थिरा घम्भीरा: The one who is leaping higher and higher, who is firm and stable and seriously determined.

3. ुग्रामा असामा शौर्या भावा: He is strong, and without an equal in the ability/mentality to fight

4. रौद्रमा नवा भीतिर्मा: His anger will cause new fears in his foes.

5.विजिटरीपुरु धीरधारा, कलोथरा शिखरा कठोरा: This is a complex expression seen only in Indic language poetry. The poet is stating that Shivudu is experiencing the intensity of climbing a tough peak, and likening

it to the feeling in a hard battle, when you see your enemy defeated, and blood flowing like a rivulet. This is classical Veera rasa.

6.कुलकु थारथिलीथा गम्भीरा, जाया विराट वीरा: His rough body itself is like a sharp weapon (because he is determined to win). Hail this complete

hero of the world.

7.विलयगागनथाला भिकारा, गरज्जद्धरा गारा: The hero is destructive in the air/sky as well (because he can leap at an enemy from a great height). He can defeat the enemy (simply) with his fearsome roar of war.
Nano Course On Python For Trading
==========================
Module 1

Python makes it very easy to analyze and visualize time series data when you’re a beginner. It's easier when you don't have to install python on your PC (that's why it's a nano course, you'll learn python...

... on the go). You will not be required to install python in your PC but you will be using an amazing python editor, Google Colab Visit
https://t.co/EZt0agsdlV

This course is for anyone out there who is confused, frustrated, and just wants this python/finance thing to work!

In Module 1 of this Nano course, we will learn about :

# Using Google Colab
# Importing libraries
# Making a Random Time Series of Black Field Research Stock (fictional)

# Using Google Colab

Intro link is here on YT: https://t.co/MqMSDBaQri

Create a new Notebook at https://t.co/EZt0agsdlV and name it AnythingOfYourChoice.ipynb

You got your notebook ready and now the game is on!
You can add code in these cells and add as many cells as you want

# Importing Libraries

Imports are pretty standard, with a few exceptions.
For the most part, you can import your libraries by running the import.
Type this in the first cell you see. You need not worry about what each of these does, we will understand it later.