The Melbourne Stars' 10 years of Big Bash history is genuinely some of the most hilarious sports in Australian history. Don't do this normally but, a thread:
More from Sport
It's time for the NBA Math player power rankings heading into games on Jan. 4!
As always, these are based solely on our Rolling Player Ratings, which are determined by performance over a player's last 10 appearances:
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
Only the last 10 games matter, and players must have played in the last week to maintain eligibility.
25. Anthony Davis, Los Angeles Lakers: 18.26
24. Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics: 18.35
23. Damian Lillard, Portland Trail Blazers: 18.39
22. Collin Sexton, Cleveland Cavaliers: 18.77
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
21. Paul George, Los Angeles Clippers: 18.77
20. Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks: 18.84
19. DeMar DeRozan, San Antonio Spurs: 18.89
18. Malcolm Brogdon, Indiana Pacers: 19.04
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
17. Domantas Sabonis, Indiana Pacers: 19.13
16. Nikola Vucevic, Orlando Magic: 19.46
15. Trae Young, Atlanta Hawks: 19.33
14. Jamal Murray, Denver Nuggets: 19.64
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
As always, these are based solely on our Rolling Player Ratings, which are determined by performance over a player's last 10 appearances:
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
Only the last 10 games matter, and players must have played in the last week to maintain eligibility.
25. Anthony Davis, Los Angeles Lakers: 18.26
24. Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics: 18.35
23. Damian Lillard, Portland Trail Blazers: 18.39
22. Collin Sexton, Cleveland Cavaliers: 18.77
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
21. Paul George, Los Angeles Clippers: 18.77
20. Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks: 18.84
19. DeMar DeRozan, San Antonio Spurs: 18.89
18. Malcolm Brogdon, Indiana Pacers: 19.04
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
17. Domantas Sabonis, Indiana Pacers: 19.13
16. Nikola Vucevic, Orlando Magic: 19.46
15. Trae Young, Atlanta Hawks: 19.33
14. Jamal Murray, Denver Nuggets: 19.64
https://t.co/cMK94AC48A
It's Sunday, Fed blackout, am recovering from soccer match, sipping on double espresso, so of course a perfect time to take on Tyler Cowen here. 🙂
Like many people, I enjoy reading Tyler's blog. But there are times (alright, many times) I disagree with him. This is no big deal. I also disagree with myself sometimes (especially my past self). But his recent post left me
What is he trying to say here? After thinking about it for a bit, I think he's critiquing the idea that "running the economy hot" leads to employment *and* real wage gains. Perhaps the former, but only at the expense of the latter. At least, this is what a textbook IS-LM model
tells us if one "runs the economy hot" through increased fiscal stimulus (on consumption and transfers, not public infrastructure investment). If this is what he meant, then he should have just said so, instead of labeling this a "Keynesian" proposition.
In fact, this property follows as a *neoclassical* proposition that is embedded in the IS-LM framework. (For non-economists, note that Keynes did not invent IS-LM; the framework was developed later by Hicks as an interpretation of *some* parts of the General Theory.)
It is hardly phony, especially on social media, to refer to IS-LM models and the like as \u201cKeynesian.\u201d Krugman pushing it and, for better or worse, rising in popularity.
— tylercowen (@tylercowen) January 17, 2021
Like many people, I enjoy reading Tyler's blog. But there are times (alright, many times) I disagree with him. This is no big deal. I also disagree with myself sometimes (especially my past self). But his recent post left me
What is he trying to say here? After thinking about it for a bit, I think he's critiquing the idea that "running the economy hot" leads to employment *and* real wage gains. Perhaps the former, but only at the expense of the latter. At least, this is what a textbook IS-LM model
tells us if one "runs the economy hot" through increased fiscal stimulus (on consumption and transfers, not public infrastructure investment). If this is what he meant, then he should have just said so, instead of labeling this a "Keynesian" proposition.
In fact, this property follows as a *neoclassical* proposition that is embedded in the IS-LM framework. (For non-economists, note that Keynes did not invent IS-LM; the framework was developed later by Hicks as an interpretation of *some* parts of the General Theory.)
You May Also Like
Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.
After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year
as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.
After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year
as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
