Davido’s A Better Time is good but not a Quality album.
A SHORT THREAD.
But is it great? No.
Is this Davido’s best? No.
The production? Sounds rushed.
The A&R(on features)was good, but not spectacular. They could have
For example you have a huge song with Chris brown already, a song that peaked #3 on Billboard World digital Songs, why does he have to be on the album again?
(Nicki minaj was a great choice btw)
Still on A&R
And why is Mayorkun on 2 songs?
That’s why I like the fact that
Secondly, as far as they’re a lot of
Hits/bangers on the album, Something fishy, The best, very special etc (see ehn, when clubs resume, we go dance tiree!!) the album can’t fit into other Nigerian markets.
Soul listeners won’t even play it twice.
But you can’t deny the fact that Davido has mastered the act of making hits. He never misses!
In the whole NGN industry, ONLY Olamide can go H2H with Davido when it comes to hit
But when you’re putting out a body of work, the approach should be better please, not just bangers all through.
Same thing happened with Omo Baba Olowo, Son of Mercy & A Good time.
Lastly, is there any song on the Album that connotes “A better Time”?
You may choose to
More from Song
👍🏻
https://t.co/0ywQ1y5NDj
Pott found an association between exposure to soot and a high incidence of scrotal skin cancer in chimney sweeps. This cancer is now known as Pott's or chimney sweep cancer.
Coal contains trace amounts of naturally-occurring radioactive elements. The process of burning coal at coal-fired power plants, called combustion, creates wastes that contain small amounts of naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM).
Fly ash particles (a major component of coal ash) can become lodged in the deepest part of your lungs, where they trigger asthma, inflammation and immunological reactions.
"When does a canary sing"
— Found&Forgiven (@AshlieMC2) December 7, 2020
See thread RT on oxidative stress and QD effects.
Thank you @NotTheMacAnon1https://t.co/XlyXyiCS2H
https://t.co/0ywQ1y5NDj
Pott found an association between exposure to soot and a high incidence of scrotal skin cancer in chimney sweeps. This cancer is now known as Pott's or chimney sweep cancer.
Coal contains trace amounts of naturally-occurring radioactive elements. The process of burning coal at coal-fired power plants, called combustion, creates wastes that contain small amounts of naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM).
Fly ash particles (a major component of coal ash) can become lodged in the deepest part of your lungs, where they trigger asthma, inflammation and immunological reactions.
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
