Are you a front-end developer or designer?

You should look at these websites which offer modern UI components in different formats.

πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡πŸ»

1. UI Design Daily:

Awesome UI Components of all types

https://t.co/72SgfNy9RQ
2. 100 Daily UI:

Free Figma library of products, elements, and screens

https://t.co/seJDWAewks
3. Open Doodles:

A Free Set of Sketchy Illustrations

https://t.co/NwyOi5JdI0
4. Humaaans:

Cool illustrations of people with the ability to mix and match

https://t.co/DSubEZO8C4
5. Paaatterns:

Free collection of beautiful patterns for all vector formats

https://t.co/Q23tCjV7Ni
6. 404 Illustration:

free illustrations for 404 pages

https://t.co/BQ76MqSeG4
7. Drawkit .io

Illustrations for designers and startups

https://t.co/5lTiWX2pMf
8. Absurd .design:

Free surrealist illustrations for designers and developers

https://t.co/74kAIC8KRW
9. Undraw .co

Open-source illustrations for any idea you can imagine and create

https://t.co/P1vmHuYKEg
10. Manypixels .co:

Monochromatic, Isometric high-quality illustrations

https://t.co/KmcUQUMVcT
11. Open Peeps:

Hand drawn illustration library

https://t.co/oJfdNY0SXA
12. Animations .co:

Beautiful, customizable animated GIF icons

https://t.co/U2A7KqeT9V
If you like this thread, please retweet it so that it reaches more people and consider subscribing to my blog where I generally write articles on topics like:

- freelancing
- AWS concepts
- system design
- becoming a better developer in general etc

https://t.co/R7zsgfu21y

More from Sunil Kumar

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x