Categories Society

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
In this Tweet, Andrew's inquiry led me to reflect.

During my time in the Taliban, I wondered how the issue of tribal interplay will be solved.

I will provide a basic synapsis & some thoughts & examples.


In some remote areas of Afghanistan, tribal dictum is seen as axiomatic in family matters, irrespective if Taliban (TB) exist.

In some rural villages, not all tribal elders are pro-TB & some are pro-Kabul Regime (KR). (recall the son who is TB & father KR)

It may be that the TB presence is reflected by 2-3 men in the entire village.

Though the TB do sustain control, in some cases, due to the cultural context, they wont override an elder's position. Why?

Here's an example. Suppose Bobzai is a tribal elder

Bobzai has 2 daughters & a son. Now the son could be a TB, yet Bobzai himself adheres to Pashtunwali.

Though the TB maintain control over the area, if Bobzai orders his son that I don't want my daughters to leave the home,

the son won't likely challenge the position of his father due to Pashtunwali.

Although, Islamically, the son is correct that his sisters should be allowed in school.

Yet, in this case, culturally, to save "face", the son may keep the dispute hidden.
Some public accountability over an argument that probably doesn’t matter but should exist publicly. To understand this feud you need to know a few things. This is my memory which isn’t perfect but is the context of what happened with me and @pinwheelempire (thread)


1. I was blocked by @pinwheelempire around 3 years ago. Something that actually really hurt as a life long Blazers fan. I thought it was because I tweeted stupid stuff about Stotts as a passionate fan during that playoffs that I don’t currently believe.

2. At some point I asked why and was informed by multiple people that the account was ran by a cop and that many media members disliked him. This was told to me many times by many people. I then believed that my race, and my public protesting of police was why I was blocked.

3. I do not work with police in any capacity because of personal trauma and historical oppression. I believe people should know when they are interacting with police. I also was/am salty about the block as a life long fan. I am still blocked.

4. Periodically I would tweet reminders that the account was ran by a cop, which I believed. Although part of my incentive was that I was hurt by the block as a fan. Recently I tweeted such a reminder which I believed especially pertinent given the current uprising.
I've made some allusions to how embarrassingly smug and lazy Kyle "I went to Yale" Smith's series is. We're two (short) posts in and it's still difficult to find substantive criticisms underneath an onslaught of purple prose and obvious contempt for community colleges.


The main allegations of his post are that Dr. Biden isn't a great writer and that she didn't do what Smith considers an adequate amount of work to justify her degree. It isn't shocking that he'd avoid substantive critique, as he lacks the expertise to make it.

In the paragraph below 👇, Smith takes Biden's citation pattern – for a potted, perfunctory history of community colleges (which isn't intended to be anything else) – as evidence that she couldn't be bothered to do the reading.


Did he bother to look at the books? At least check their tables of contents? One can find some basic information online. Cohen & Brawer (2003) appears to be a standard textbook on community colleges (cited 5400+ times). The page ranges reflect... relevant parts of the text.


I couldn't find a TOC with pagination for Witt et al., but here's a summary of the contents 👇. Again, given the substance the page ranges aren't terribly surprising, especially since she cites a different source for her *two sentences* on the pre-crash 1920s.
We’ve released our latest bulletin for deaths registered in England and Wales for week ending 8 January 2021 https://t.co/IwPoNzHUvu

These data have been affected by the Boxing Day and New Year’s Day bank holidays, and should be treated with caution.

The provisional number of deaths registered in England and Wales in the week ending 8 January 2021 (Week 1) was 17,751.

This was 7,682 more than Week 53.

Please note: this sharp increase may be because of the New Year Bank Holiday
https://t.co/hfjsArBUyM


In the week ending 8 January, the provisional number of deaths registered was 45.8% (5,576 deaths) above the five-year average.

This increase should be treated with caution because of the bank holidays

Of the 17,751 deaths registered in Week 1, 6,057 mentioned #COVID19 on the death certificate (34.1% of all deaths).

This has risen by 2,913 #COVID19 deaths since the previous week https://t.co/i7g7eFBN8z


Of the 6,057 deaths involving #COVID19, 88.6% had this recorded as the underlying cause of death.

Of the 4,649 deaths involving influenza and pneumonia, 8.2% had these as the underlying cause
THREAD.
What I love most about @DrFullertonMPP & her team (⤵️) is that they won't respond to me but instead they go around me to those in my circle in the hopes those people aren't tracking their failures IRL time like I've been (in order to combat their nonsense).


1. I call your bluff: LIST THE HOMES YOU ACTUALLY DEPLOYED THESE 20 RED CROSS TEAMS TO.

List them.

...because I can only track those (on less than one hand) that have been sent this aid.

2. Let's talk some truth @JustineLewkowic

You only called in Red Cross (release posted Dec 23).

Homes like #TendercareLTC, Sunnycrest or St. George, Craiglee didn't even receive this support that YOU HAVE AT YOUR DISPOSAL.

3. We have homes in CRISIS all across ONT yet you haven't deployed this aid that they so desperately need....because.....you claim the HOME needs to ask for it?
You are aware these bad actors DON'T WANT ATTENTION DRAWN TO THEM RIGHT?
They WON'T make the call 9 times out of 10.

4. So instead, you stand by & watch people die...many from preventable deaths caused by negligence AND INSETAD OF DEPLOYING THE HELP YOU HAVE ALREADY BEEN FUNDED BY THE FEDS, you choose to spend your time contacting those around me trying to convince them YOU'RE NOT INCOMPETENT?
I'm going to have to draw the line here. And, that's in reaction to a piece from, of all people, Greg Sargent - whom I regard as perhaps the @washingtonpost's top regular political columnist.

A text search shows the words "Christian","evangelical","fundamentalist" are absent...


Consider the context - back on January 6th, protestors gathered in small groups on the Mall, and called upon their deity to consecrate what they were about to do. Then, in a howling mob, attacked the Capitol Building. Once inside the House chamber, they consecrated it to Jesus.

Now, let's walk it back a couple of years. In early 2017, I thought to myself, "OK, this is gonna be kind of predictable, but I'm going to look into the radical evangelicals flooding into the new Trump Administration."

See, I knew that would happen. It was transactional...

4) Trump cut a deal w/the evangelicals, along the lines of "vote me in, and I'll let your people do whatever the hell they want to do in my administration."

And it was so. In early 2017 I wrote this:

5) I was, to my knowledge, the 1st to write about this phenomenon, Ralph Drollinger's in-house theocratic bible study for Trump's cabinet.

Over the next few years, covering Drollinger's thingy become quite a media cottage industry. Predictably, none of the pieces mentioned mine