Categories Society
Which if taught to sons - gives them the right to be vile to women, invalidate their importance in man's life (which I'm not suggesting should be the *only* thing) but it is a little too, foolish. Not something I'd want "sons" to know.
— Saneeka Paradkar (@saneetarypad) October 17, 2020
A very small proportion of men become cold by hearing to the experiences of the previous generation. No being can close itself when it comes to love. The roughest of creatures understand love through their senses.
What you are implicitly suggesting is that, let's invalidate all the thoughts of men since some of their thoughts is highly patriarchal and chauvinistic.
Let's just talk about the tweet I've quoted here and the couple of tweets I had posted on Instagram yesterday. If you haven't seen them I'll attach a screenshot.
The fact that these things are being mentioned in such a small proportion on social media is way more important to me than the rough undertone. I don't align with all the thoughts of the said person, it would be wrong to generalise that way.
The boy travelled from Al-Jawf to Sana'a because al-Jawf is among "high intensity battlefronts" & is the target of repeated civilian airstrikes. https://t.co/1KlIN5ixTf
Also, roads are "damaged" because they're frequently bombed by US/Saudi airstrikes:
Shockingly, he's one of the lucky ones who managed to make it to a hospital.
Only 51% of health facilities are (barely) functioning: https://t.co/GBgKXM562t
And hospitals have been frequently targeted by airstrikes: For example:
International aid & donations are necessary for Faid & millions to survive because of the Saudi/US/UAE blockade that prevents Yemenis from trade and makes them reliant on aid instead. Before the war, Yemen imported 90% of its food; now, 80% rely on aid.
Famine hasn't been declared because the UN faces immense pressure from its top donors, the US & Saudi, who are also causing the famine in Yemen.
The US went as far as pressuring the UN to restrict aid to Northern Yemen, where 70% of Yemenis live:
A thread in which I prove (using ONLY published Pfizer trial data) that the UK CMOs and JCVI have not so much ignored the science, as left it bleeding at the roadside.
Intrigued?
Read
The trial data said that after a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine coverage was 52%. Six days after the second dose that rose to nearly 91%. The new policy to delay 2nd dose is based on the idea that the 91% was in fact due to the first dose. We must hope that is true.
— Krishnan Guru-Murthy (@krishgm) December 30, 2020
From the moment, the decision was announced to delay 2nd vaccine doses, I've felt uneasy.
This is not my field of expertise, but I trained as a scientist (two chemistry degrees), worked professionally in IT, and understand the importance of testing.
My principal concern was about the Pfizer vaccine.
As vaccines go, it's "new tech", the first mRNA vaccine and the results are stunning.
Perhaps one should be cautious about deviating from a clinical trial procedure, at least until there is greater experience of mRNA vaccines?
I've been investigating this for over a week and haven't been able to sleep properly since I started.
At best, the 12 weeks strategy was based on one critical assumption, namely that the 2nd dose has NO effect on efficacy in the first 7 days after it is given.
And if it did?
My journey started with a friend pointing me towards an article in @bmj_latest which indicated that a single dose of @pfizer vaccine had an efficacy of
I was going to make a video on this but my face is too puffy from crying my eyes out last night.
If you look at what my former friends said last night, it’s pretty disgusting.
Compare that to my direct interactions with them.
Why not call them out by name? It’s called class. I don’t even call out my harasser by name.
I spent the evening discouraging people to not speak out in my defense. It leads to further problems.
Anyways, here we go.
Step 1. Google your name.
If you’re an anon account, what you need to do is Google your username in various combos with your actual name.
For example:
[username] + Sarah
[username] + home state
[username] + employer
If you can find it, someone else can, too.
Simple stuff.
Personal safety involves a combo of Google searches. We need to assess what info is publicly available.
— Sarah Mojarad (@Sarah_Mojarad) December 8, 2020
Google the important info:
Name
Phone number
Address
Name + address
Phone number + address
Family members
Folks, your safety is important. Do this NOW before the harassment.
Step 2. The quickest/easiest way to be identified is using the same username on multiple SoMe platforms.
Everyone is on multiple platforms. If you’re posting pics or list your name, it’ll be found.
An anon shared identities w me using this method. I ignored the info.
@rak3re aptly identifies a sudden shift in global consensus in early March, which led to endless lockdowns. But it’s vital to realize this shift didn’t just happen; the CCP launched an entire campaign of propaganda and fraudulent science to bring it about. Let’s recap.
What happened in those ten days? The moral burden of the pandemic\u2019s outcome shifted as a global consensus (read: groupthink) began to emerge that China\u2019s declining cases \u2013 after three months of uncontrolled spread \u2013 was explained entirely by its \u201cdraconian\u201d measures. 7/ pic.twitter.com/pCFLvU5zdx
— rak3re (@rak3re) February 2, 2021
2/ In late Feb., WHO was dazzled by China: “China’s uncompromising and rigorous use of non-pharmaceutical measures to contain transmission of the COVID-19 virus in multiple settings provides vital lessons for the global
3/ In a press conference, Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO’s China mission, told the press: “What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this. If you do it, you can save lives and prevent thousands of cases of what is a very difficult disease.”
https://t.co/KpAqMTKnEM
4/ Two days later, in an interview for China Central Television (CCTV), Aylward (who later disconnected a live interview when asked about Taiwan) put it bluntly: “Copy China’s response to
5/ @NYTimes immediately lapped up the WHO’s February report: “China ‘took one of the most ancient strategies and rolled out one of the most ambitious, agile and aggressive disease-containment efforts in