Don't worry it only starts with a poll but if you have a degree in nigga theory, you probably imagine this is because "the pussy game ridiculous"
Words are not actions.
But boy is that a weird shift, huh?
Important though and why I'm really posting this.
This is the first time I've seen this one.
The first reason that wasn't a nullification or "I had a bad day"
If this went further I have theories on things that I'd be going off on right now but, this alone isn't enough.
You already know the joke because it's just that normal.
I don't even need to say what the logic is here because you know that too.
You probably always thought it was a strange thing.

>If they don't look for solutions and just want an emotional catharsis, does that mean they already know how to solve something?

That conclusion is what happens when it's framed as a contrast.
And now you know the reality of how that actually plays out.
You could connect this to a thousand different things if you accept it's a fundamental behavior. Why has there never been a society headed by women that ever progressed anywhere? Why is tolerance such an abnormal thing to male dominated societies?
Why are revolutions almost always headed by men? Why is art, literature etc. you get the point if you were to do that.
Or, more presently:

Why is everything in our society about one big display that makes things seem so grand and so important and so absolutely and totally solved? Yet our crises never seem to actually change anything. Everything is a scandal in it's nature.
Yet it results in nothing.
And we seem perpetually stuck in an emotional roller-coaster of highs and lows.
Well, you know.
Ugh, like, why would I like, ugh, ever want to talk about my feelings when I could be getting fucking STUFFED
So the male reason is typically, "want fug" and the female reasons seem to be...pretty much the same thing plus "actually I am emotionally a child"
Very cool, God!

More from Polina

More from Society

1/ A thread of comments & observations about the death of the cackling vampire Rush Limbaugh.

My first observations in the main thread are here, but this offshoot is needed because there's been so many wise & witty things I've


2/ First, re: those who in their wayward moral obtuseness feel we "can't speak ill of the dead." I've said that this is what abuse enablers say, but I hear that some religious traditions preach this. Oy.
So there's this: https://t.co/7Ky4RA3nkZ &


3/ Drucker is another great wit, and this carries the proper mood


4/ There's definitely a Jewish Tradition angle for how to treat evil people who die: the only respect is to justice, right & wrong, and above all compassion's existence necessitates condemning cruelty


5/ We're coming up on #Purim, and that's all about how to remember evil. There may be a reason, then, that I share the attitude of many other people committed to righting
This is a piece I've been thinking about for a long time. One of the most dominant policy ideas in Washington is that policy should, always and everywhere, move parents into paid labor. But what if that's wrong?

My reporting here convinced me that there's no large effect in either direction on labor force participation from child allowances. Canada has a bigger one than either Romney or Biden are considering, and more labor force participation among women.

But what if that wasn't true?

Forcing parents into low-wage, often exploitative, jobs by threatening them and their children with poverty may be counted as a success by some policymakers, but it’s a sign of a society that doesn’t value the most essential forms of labor.

The problem is in the very language we use. If I left my job as a New York Times columnist to care for my 2-year-old son, I’d be described as leaving the labor force. But as much as I adore him, there is no doubt I’d be working harder. I wouldn't have stopped working!

I tried to render conservative objections here fairly. I appreciate that @swinshi talked with me, and I'm sorry I couldn't include everything he said. I'll say I believe I used his strongest arguments, not more speculative ones, in the piece.

You May Also Like