When they say that transwomen are at more risk than women, when they say transwomen live in a state of perpetual victimhood, when they hold women morally responsible for what men do to transwomen - what they mean is that transwomen's experience is more significant.
Examples:
Because for some reason 28 murders of transwomen in 1 year in the US is an epidemic, but 6 femicides A DAY isn't.
https://t.co/hpIfz6HhOQ
I asked @Colmogorman if the threats of rape and murder that women face when debating issues that affect them were as abusive as women not believing transwomen are women. He blocked me.
— \U0001d413\U0001d421\U0001d41e \U0001d411\U0001d41e\U0001d42c\U0001d42d \U0001d428\U0001d41f \U0001d414\U0001d42c (@therestofus5) December 5, 2020
I guess that means no, threats against women aren't as significant. https://t.co/taLX80T6Jq pic.twitter.com/HfYeyzs1sB
https://t.co/OppYF9qAiE
Femicide of innocent brown women in Brazil will never matter as much as the murder of transwomen working there in prostitution because nothing is an epidemic of note unless men are the victims. \U0001f626https://t.co/37UjMb8tTL
— Tiffany \u26a2 Woman4Women (@Woman4W) December 5, 2020
https://t.co/WYs6g0uT2H
Assaulting a woman because you hate women is not a hate crime.
— \U0001d413\U0001d421\U0001d41e \U0001d411\U0001d41e\U0001d42c\U0001d42d \U0001d428\U0001d41f \U0001d414\U0001d42c (@therestofus5) August 2, 2020
Assaulting a transwoman because you hate transwomen is a hate crime.
Criminality is dependent on the victim, not on the perpetrator. Hating women is not criminal. Hating males who want to be women, is.#cisprivilege
https://t.co/E6IvWvGpXO
\u201cTrans people are the most oppressed group in the history of the world we are literally dying every day!\u201d
— Sophie XY \U0001f7e5 (@Manaxium) December 14, 2020
Cool, what\u2019s your first battle gonna be? Discrimination in employment and housing? Maybe trans specific shelters?
\u201cThe right to examine rape victims of the opposite sex!\u201d pic.twitter.com/WaRU18V2wc
An open letter to the guy on twitter who wonders if biological sex is realhttps://t.co/cT75s964T0
— \U0001d413\U0001d421\U0001d41e \U0001d411\U0001d41e\U0001d42c\U0001d42d \U0001d428\U0001d41f \U0001d414\U0001d42c (@therestofus5) June 7, 2020
More from Society
Ready?
Create a private foundation and give it all away. 1/
Let's stipulate first that lottery winners often have a hard time. Being publicly identified makes you a target for "friends" and "family" who want your money, as well as for non-family grifters and con men. 2/
The stress can be damaging, even deadly, and Uncle Sam takes his huge cut. Plus, having a big pool of disposable income can be irresistible to people not accustomed to managing wealth. https://t.co/fiHsuJyZwz 3/
Meanwhile, the private foundation is as close as we come to Downton Abbey and the landed aristocracy in this country. It's a largely untaxed pot of money that grows significantly over time, and those who control them tend to entrench their own privileges and those of their kin. 4
Here's how it works for a big lotto winner:
1. Win the prize.
2. Announce that you are donating it to the YOUR NAME HERE Family Foundation.
3. Receive massive plaudits in the press. You will be a folk hero for this decision.
4. Appoint only trusted friends/family to board. 5/
You May Also Like
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?