https://t.co/Rv9XUGHv49
THREAD: Today, @courierjournal published Beyond Breonna, a series on systemic racism and how Louisville can end it.
It was spurred by the death of Breonna Taylor. But these issues have existed for generations. People are tired of the same
https://t.co/Rv9XUGHv49
We start with health because Black people are dying younger in Louisville - from homicides, chronic illnesses and now the coronavirus.
https://t.co/BGf0SpMrt8
And disparities in treatment have made Black patients mistrust the system.
https://t.co/BGf0SpMrt8
"I was always told, 'It's an act of God, these things happen.'"
https://t.co/BGf0SpMrt8
In Louisville, it still isn't, @HayesGardner reported.
https://t.co/JhaWtE6V8n
https://t.co/JhaWtE6V8n
In Louisville, just 36% of Black households own their home, while 70% of white households do.
https://t.co/BQ8RNJgqGh
Black home-ownership rates fell between 2000 and 2017. And Black people are still evicted at higher rates than white people - including Kwmisha Adams, a mother of four.
https://t.co/BQ8RNJgqGh
"What hurts me the most, it's not me that I have to think about, it's four kids. ... I'm already living in government assistance. How much lower can a person feel?"
https://t.co/BQ8RNJgqGh
This one is hard.
Kris Smith, who @HayesGardner featured, was shot and killed Friday as this series was awaiting publication.
https://t.co/qvIJO2OaIj
But he sat in jail for multiple years awaiting two trials on felony gun possession, eventually taking a plea.
“You get so tired of being in there, locked up, you’ll take damn near anything."
https://t.co/qvIJO2OaIj
https://t.co/qvIJO2OaIj
But as @HayesGardner shows with the story of William Isaac, the lack of opportunities sometimes leads people to commit crimes.
https://t.co/Q8MctcY2EI
“If you don’t have any hope, and you’re discouraged, then, I don’t know. You’re just gonna do things that you shouldn’t do," Isaac said.
https://t.co/Q8MctcY2EI
In 2020, 2.4% of Louisville businesses are Black-owned.
https://t.co/S3tpBVNt20
https://t.co/S3tpBVNt20
The coronavirus is deepening disparities, giving these issues even more urgency.
But Louisville isn't naive about how to solve them. People know what needs to be done.
The question is: Do we have the will?
https://t.co/oRs5f6IBPJ
People wanted to know how Louisville could prevent something similar from happening here.
5 years later, little has changed.
https://t.co/oRs5f6IBPJ
But community members say, in many cases, the obstacle isn't funding — it's a matter of priority and personal will.
https://t.co/oRs5f6IBPJ
https://t.co/oRs5f6IBPJ
Here are 50 potential solutions.
https://t.co/ND4jJI1Wb8
https://t.co/o10nF81t4c
More from Society
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.