THREAD: It’s important to hold each criminal accountable. I will say this on what has become a daily basis. The criminal conspiracy run out of the WH pre/during/post 45** is global. When piecing together a conspiracy as large as this naturally Prosecutors want the “big” 1/

fish arguably 45** (certainly) & equally important, his puppeteers. My professional opinion is smart attys both state & federal have been piecing together the puzzle since whiff one. 45** & crew pretty much included every crime imaginable including murder & for that the 2/
time necessary to make your case is significant. But we have people to deal with ASAP like DeJoy who continues his push to destroy USPS & maintains his enormous conflicts of interest. We have the riot guide & insurrectionists. We have Rudy & ppl like that Eric fella. We have 3/
the necessity to build an independent/apolitical agency to hold all these criminals accountable. We have the illegal pardons & the deliberate deaths of 400,000 souls at the hands of Jared & everyone else. We have the call with GA to flip the election & Graham’s call for 4/
the same. We have Nunes exposed during the 1st impeachment trial along w other legislators. We have the Mueller report & we have Barr politicizing the DOJ. He conveniently resigned prior to the riot & there’s no way he was unaware of the crimes about to happen. That is a crime 5/
in and of itself. We have the appointment of Kavanaugh after a perjurious job interview & the ties he has to alt-right groups re his debt, etc. He’s a purchased asset. Barret must be addressed as well. Was she honest her entire testimony? We have the Ukraine call & all 6/
involved & we have the insider trading of Senators from GA off of classified intel re a global pandemic. They can be indicted tomorrow. Go after Rudy. He will flip. Go after Dershowitz if he’s tied to the Epstein scandal. Revisit Epstein & make sure Maxwell flips. Tie the 7/
insurrection to the Russian interference in the election of 45**. The pieces are there. And so on and so forth but what needs immediate attention are lawmakers continuing to control law who are part of the conspiracy & at the direction of another power. They will soon sit 8/
as jurors over a trial of their coconspirator. Start indicting and arresting & getting more clues. Small people who flip often have significant information. Make the moves. This is how we heal. Brick by brick we undo the damage and brick by brick we rebuild better than before. 9/
The holes we have seen in each of our branches must be repaired. We MUST enact new laws, we must test the pardon power, we MUST reign in the executive and we MUST dump the OLC memorandum at the heart of this destruction. Every step matters. MAKE THE MOVES. /END

More from Society

Hi @officestudents @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk

The Equality and Diversity section of your job application has 'gender' in what appears to be a list of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.

However...

1/15


However, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

Sex is the protected characteristic under the Act, but that is not on your list.

2/15


You then ask for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:

Male
Female.

3/15


Again, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

4/15


Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that.

https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF

'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.

5/15

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.