Simple trading system on such a Gap down day.
"5 Minute t/f"
with #supertrend
In this ocean, all kinds survive.
Only the egotist come out & yaps all day, how he/ she is the best.
Come to Madurai market & see the beehive of activity.
Everyone minds their own business
"Make Money"
More from Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Holding 660 & 680, poised for big run in the days, weeks & months ahead.
Volume goes with rises
Thank you.\U0001f64f
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) August 18, 2021
A fresh input for you. #McDowell
A major triangle break out in the coming months.
Presently poised to move out of recent consolidation pic.twitter.com/J15F06ODUq
Read again till you understand the logic fully of a "Moving avg (13Sma) & its upper & lower band" mechanism and then,
Apply on charts of your short listed stocks and understand how the trades/ investments would have worked -back testing
Bollinger band has been a trusted guide with the settings of 13sma & 2 std deviation. Add to it 5 & 8 smas and it works in all time frames.
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) September 29, 2020
Start from week & Day for investments; Hour & 5 minute for intraday.
Experiment initially; you'll still need other tools to read the mkt\U0001f600\U0001f64f pic.twitter.com/yEkHiDHiha
OR, it just moves between 13 & 21 & move higher
Channel bottom comes around "17300"- no guarantee that every time it touches the channel bottom
Patience pays
IF you miss a trade, wait for the next
They always come🙂🙏 https://t.co/CfVFhgbFxl
Is it better to buy when price below ema 21 ?\u2026 as SL will be less
— TaksJ (@TaksJoh) February 16, 2022
#Elliottwave puts #PriceAction in it's context
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) December 2, 2021
You're 1 undisputed expert on prime source of everything, #PriceAction
Let beginner start with #PriceAction & then step up to 12345 & ABC
Baby steps alone will take to maturity
Read this book months ago - "Rich Experience shared"\U0001f64f https://t.co/VUbG6F5Ems pic.twitter.com/PProaFsMsV
More from Screeners
A small thread.
PART 1 - https://t.co/ooxepHpYKL
Traders show your support by like & retweet to benefit all
@Mitesh_Engr @ITRADE191 @ProdigalTrader @nakulvibhor @RajarshitaS @Puretechnicals9 @AnandableAnand @Anshi_________ @ca_mehtaravi
VWAP for intraday Trading Part -1
— Learn to Trade (@learntotrade365) August 28, 2021
A small thread PART -2 will be released tomorrow
Traders show your support by like & retweet to benefit all@Mitesh_Engr @ITRADE191 @ProdigalTrader @nakulvibhor @ArjunB9591 @CAPratik_INDIAN @RajarshitaS @Stockstudy8 @vivbajaj @Prakashplutus pic.twitter.com/y8bwisM4hB
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
Chart 4
You May Also Like
A small tribute/gift to members
Screeners
technical screeners - intraday and positional both
before proceeding - i have helped you , can i ask you so that it can help someone else too
thank you
positional one
run - find #stock - draw chart - find levels
1- Stocks closing daily 2% up from 5 days
https://t.co/gTZrYY3Nht
2- Weekly breakout
https://t.co/1f4ahEolYB
3- Breakouts in short term
https://t.co/BI4h0CdgO2
4- Bullish from last 5
intraday screeners
5- 15 minute Stock Breakouts
https://t.co/9eAo82iuNv
6- Intraday Buying seen in the past 15 minutes
https://t.co/XqAJKhLB5G
7- Stocks trading near day's high on 5 min chart with volume BO intraday
https://t.co/flHmm6QXmo
Thank you
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]