“Time is a flat circle,” Rust Cohle famously opined. I’ve always taken that as another form of the biblical proclamation that there’s nothing new under the sun. I think about that on New Year’s Day, as we unite in contrived joy at the rolling over of our astronomical odometer.

Declaring today to be no different than yesterday because of an arbitrary date change is neither novel nor insightful. But it might be worth considering in a year when we were once again reminded how craven and unreliable humanity really is—especially in the western world.
One of the great things about education is that it forces you to think about uncomfortable truths—in this case, the classic “trilemma” and the Westphalian model of statehood. Or in layman’s terms...is democracy all it’s cracked up to be? Has our focus on the individual doomed us?
It strikes me that one of our great failings as humans is that of imagination—rather, our consistent inability to imagine the comfortable, constant structures of our personal worlds crumbling. We are prisoners of the present in that way.
If I could back to 2000 and tell you that in 20 years the Twin Towers would be gone, we’d be embroiled in two decades of war, we’d have a President who supports groups that claim “6MWE” and Mary Ann from Gilligan’s Island would be one of 250k+ Americans who died of a plague...
...well, you wouldn’t believe me. You couldn’t.

You—as someone raised on a steady diet of motherhood & apple pie & American exceptionalism—would not be capable of internalizing those predictions as real possibilities (nor would I, were I not the narrator in this hypothetical).
But all that happened.

Every calamitous event of the last 20 years has happened before, in some form or fashion. Plague. Corruption. Financial collapse. War under false pretenses. There is nothing new under the sun. Time is a flat circle.
I once thought we could beat climate change with global action, but we can’t even unite over wearing masks to stop us from killing one another. The Western world has brainwashed itself into believing that our responsibility to the world ends—quite literally—at our own nose.
We fell in love with capitalism (for obvious reasons) and have proceeded to remove ever more control rods from the economic reactor. We’ve pushed so far that the mere suggestion of sensible controls is met with bleats of “SOCIALISM!” from bow-tied pawns of the billionaire class.
Now we stand here—January 1, 2021—on the precipice of a new decade, in this young century, facing a host of calamities we are mentally and institutionally incapable of addressing. We cling to the mantras of the past with such fervor that we have feet of clay.
What does all this mean? I don’t suppose to know, other than to say that the world—the physical planet we inhabit and the 7 billion other people on it—will not consent to stay static within the failing systems we have. History is a catalog of dialectical force and destruction.
But we love the idea that this arbitrary new year will be better. It gives us hope. But hope is not a course of action. If anything, it seems like a gambler’s wish against house odds—a house that has pharmacists destroying COVID vaccines and lunatics bombing AT&T over 5G.
Maybe the only way out is to abandon our obsession with ourselves and our contrived definitions of freedom and to act like a nation and a world in deep crisis—because that’s what we are.
At any rate, it’s New Year’s Day. The world is quiet, for a moment. I hope you find peace in it. I hope 2020 wasn’t the worst year of your life. If it was, I’m glad you survived.

The powerful play goes on, as Whitman said, and you may contribute a verse. Make yours a good one.

More from Science

https://t.co/hXlo8qgkD0
Look like that they got a classical case of PCR Cross-Contamination.
They had 2 fabricated samples (SRX9714436 and SRX9714921) on the same PCR run. Alongside with Lung07. They did not perform metagenomic sequencing on the “feces” and they did not get


A positive oral or anal swab from anywhere in their sampling. Feces came from anus and if these were positive the anal swabs must also be positive. Clearly it got there after the NA have been extracted and were from the very low-level degraded RNA which were mutagenized from

The Taq.
https://t.co/yKXCgiT29w to see SRX9714921 and SRX9714436.
Human+Mouse in the positive SRA, human in both of them. Seeing human+mouse in identical proportions across 3 different sequencers (PRJNA573298, A22, SEX9714436) are pretty straight indication that the originals

Were already contaminated with Human and mouse from the very beginning, and that this contamination is due to dishonesty in the sample handling process which prescribe a spiking of samples in ACE2-HEK293T/A549, VERO E6 and Human lung xenograft mouse.

The “lineages” they claimed to have found aren’t mutational lineages at all—all the mutations they see on these sequences were unique to that specific sequence, and are the result of RNA degradation and from the Taq polymerase errors accumulated from the nested PCR process
https://t.co/a6yrWK5dqg


https://t.co/Xe5xFdtDfO


https://t.co/e3RBxj0ly3


https://t.co/cJlCMqyP2v


https://t.co/5n5TK67iKB

You May Also Like

1/ Some initial thoughts on personal moats:

Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.

Characteristics of a personal moat below:


2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.

As Andrew Chen noted:


3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized

Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than


4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.

After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.

5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.

In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.

Always. No, your company is not an exception.

A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.

Listen to Aditya


And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.

I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.

You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.

Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]