Hindcopper cmp146+
Previous low 135 can be the SL for longs.
Possible short term bottom here CONFIRMATION ABOVE 158 for further upside
Hindcopper -- Expect Buying interest once price cross/close above 157-158 zone pic.twitter.com/GfRd1yHFpH
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) July 5, 2021
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
BEML
1. Stock is consolidating in the band 100-120 on lower side & 1900-1950 on upper side.
2. CMP 1344 1st targets 1850-1950
3. Medium term targets 2400-2500
4. Long term taregts 3500 first and then 8,000-10,000 in next 4-5 yrs
5. This is going to be 15-16 years breakout https://t.co/BXMv5GjsGW
6. Stock hits high 160-175 in 1995 & 1997
7. went into down trend, consolidated for 3 yrs 1999-2002
8. Gave breakout above 34 hinting at major shift in Feb 2002
9. Gave 1st multi year breakout in Oct 2003 above 160-175 which was failed
10. Next attempt in Sep 2004 crossed 175
11. Above 1995-1997 highs (160-175) stock went on to become 10x in a matter of 20-22 months
12. CMP 1344 Multi year breakout will trigger above 1950 on weekly closing basis
13. Will be watching 1st breakout above 1950
14. SL 1260/1100 depends on risk of the trader or investor
1. Stock is consolidating in the band 100-120 on lower side & 1900-1950 on upper side.
2. CMP 1344 1st targets 1850-1950
3. Medium term targets 2400-2500
4. Long term taregts 3500 first and then 8,000-10,000 in next 4-5 yrs
5. This is going to be 15-16 years breakout https://t.co/BXMv5GjsGW
Spotted a stock which can become 5digits and 5x over 3-5 years
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) September 2, 2021
Headquarters in Namma Bengaluru, Karnataka.
Keep Thinking will post over weekend\U0001f92a
6. Stock hits high 160-175 in 1995 & 1997
7. went into down trend, consolidated for 3 yrs 1999-2002
8. Gave breakout above 34 hinting at major shift in Feb 2002
9. Gave 1st multi year breakout in Oct 2003 above 160-175 which was failed
10. Next attempt in Sep 2004 crossed 175
11. Above 1995-1997 highs (160-175) stock went on to become 10x in a matter of 20-22 months
12. CMP 1344 Multi year breakout will trigger above 1950 on weekly closing basis
13. Will be watching 1st breakout above 1950
14. SL 1260/1100 depends on risk of the trader or investor
More from Nishhindcopper
Will post charts of next potential movers tomorrow. Interested?
#Dare2Drm
#HindCopper Stock is coming out of a big consolidation. A move above 147, stock could be headed to 165 (next resistance). If #BseMetals index breaks out, i am expecting levels of 196 again and if that gets taken out, levels of 220. lets see - one step at a time
#Dare2Drm
#Dare2Drm
Will post charts of next potential movers tomorrow. Interested.#Dare2Drm
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) July 9, 2021
#HindCopper Stock is coming out of a big consolidation. A move above 147, stock could be headed to 165 (next resistance). If #BseMetals index breaks out, i am expecting levels of 196 again and if that gets taken out, levels of 220. lets see - one step at a time
#Dare2Drm
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x