#SBIN
#SBILife
Probable #SuperPattern Bullish
@shivaji_1983 https://t.co/8e8YvbpWW7
Multi Chart Scanner #Nifty500
— Vithal (@srvithal388) August 13, 2022
Box 1% EOD
Price Scanner - Probable Super Pattern stocks
Relative Strength Scanner - Price above MA - Moving Average and ST - Super Trend in Relative Strength
Denominator - #Nifty500 pic.twitter.com/FFIRInUGIs
More from Vithal
More from Sbin
#FnOstock #SBIN has completed a 9 month time correction towards the primary trend line & is all set to head higher from here.
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) July 11, 2022
This could also be a #SIP stock considering it broke out from a decade long consolidation in Feb'21.
Might continue to outperform #Nifty & #Banknifty pic.twitter.com/mYk4exvOn7
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".