#Rolexrings
I'll go with 5th is getting done soon.
There is one more possibility that 3rd wave is sub-dividing !!
IF so it must hold last rise #retracement https://t.co/a6BBHIWrZk
ROLEX RINGS
— manav (@manav1418) June 24, 2022
Elliot counts (possible scenario's)
Which wave count is correct as per you\U0001f64f
please guide....!!@nakulvibhor @nishkumar1977 @JustNifty @piyushchaudhry @KrunallThakkar pic.twitter.com/h97J8Ycuf5
More from Van ilango (JustNifty)
Have patience; let the market reveal it's hand.
You ask me or any other persons, they'll tell you their subjective view however unbiased they attempt to be.
It is their view and not necessarily the market's.
My subjective view is labelled in the charts.
Follow #Priceaction https://t.co/37iXFtWPzU
You ask me or any other persons, they'll tell you their subjective view however unbiased they attempt to be.
It is their view and not necessarily the market's.
My subjective view is labelled in the charts.
Follow #Priceaction https://t.co/37iXFtWPzU
Currently reading the book you put on your website. Also, from this if we consider 18600 as 5 th wave end of Nifty ideally it's doing the 1st 12345 of downtrend, of which do e already 1234, currently going towards 5 which I believe should go below 100% of 4th retracement wave
— de soloist \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@ChakiArijit) November 4, 2021
Let me apply @Bijay_reborn 's strategies in options for some days and then share them.
2 Strategies I liked:
1. Plot ATM week CE/PE charts with VWAP & OI Change. Buy when prices move past VWAP while OI starts to move down.
2. Plot ATM Mth CE/ PE with AVWAP. If above, buy wk CE/PE
2 Strategies I liked:
1. Plot ATM week CE/PE charts with VWAP & OI Change. Buy when prices move past VWAP while OI starts to move down.
2. Plot ATM Mth CE/ PE with AVWAP. If above, buy wk CE/PE
master can you give few key points in english. Saw the entire video with subtitles but did not understand.
— bala (@BalaThink) March 13, 2022
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
