Great to hear that Hindus have no right to comment upon Sikhism. Fine. But then, why have Sikhs the right to chant verses of their Gurus (which are NOT Hindu as Sikhs have categorically declared they've nothing to do with Hinduism) that outrightly insult Hindu beliefs? Read on.

@SSanbeer May I please know what this verse is doing in the Granth of Sikhism? It's from a Sikh website, the link to which is https://t.co/gWXxfq1AaY
@SSanbeer Now on, all these links are from a yet another Sikh website, the link to which is https://t.co/7wehhV8xtL
@SSanbeer
@SSanbeer
@SSanbeer
@SSanbeer
@SSanbeer If Sikhs are not Hindus (that their intellectual Bhai Kahn Singh categorically declared in the 19th century with the publication of his paper 'Hum Hindu Nahi'), why are they still carrying these direct and insulting attacks upon Hindu devi-devtaas, beliefs and rituals?
@SSanbeer And until and unless Sikhs remove these gravely insulting words towards Hinduism said by their Gurus and recorded in their official texts, why must Hindus not consider them to be an extension of the idol-worshipper-hating Islamic cult?

More from Religion

@Kate_SdE @PriyamvadaGopal @ChathamHouse @AdomGetachew Hindu nationalism should not have a negative connotation. It’s not exclusivist because Hinduism isn’t a religion - rather, it’s a way of life, and the term “Hindu” refer broadly to the people around and east of the Sindhu. This transcends the modern construct of religions.

@PriyamvadaGopal @ChathamHouse @AdomGetachew For “Hindus” - a broad-brush stroke for a people whose culture is underpinned by a knowledge system that provides logical structure for adopters of a plethora of philosophies, “Hindu nationalism” by definition, is inclusive and pluralistic. It gives space to everyone.

@PriyamvadaGopal @ChathamHouse @AdomGetachew If Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva-Mimamsa, Buddhist and Jain philosophies are studied in comparison with Abrahamic faiths, India’s unique Carl Popper Paradox comes to light. The imposition of a western matrix of secularism on a pluralistic culture has done much harm.

@PriyamvadaGopal @ChathamHouse @AdomGetachew Because the traditions are rooted in universalist philosophies, India gladly hosts followers of non-proselytizing faiths. Supremacist theocratic ideologies find little resonance with the people of the land. To understand “Hindu nationalism,” one has to study Indic philosophy.

@PriyamvadaGopal @ChathamHouse @AdomGetachew Equally, it is important to view history objectively, know the excesses of supremacist invaders/colonizers, and importantly, understand the asymmetries created by the “secular” state which structurally disadvantage the vastly heterogeneous so-called “Hindu” majority.

You May Also Like