Categories Politics

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
1/22

How many of us saw the double entendre in the QAnon slogan, “The Storm.”

We all probably assumed it had to do with proverbial precipitation. No, it literally meant the act of storming.

QAnon presents a threat to us, because it is severely misinforming our loved ones.

2/22
Some say it was a guy in Australia that created the original Q account (Paul Furber,
https://t.co/d94IPkxc92) cosplaying with others who made the same sort of accounts (like a bunch of nerds) on 4chan; and that he moved to an image board on 8chan, becoming even more popular.

3/22
But he got his password hacked twice. The first time it happened, they guessed his password (some derivative of “Matlock”). Because random people could post as Q, he changed it by adding an exclamation point.

4/22
The second time, though, the owners of 8chan stole Furber’s Q account for themselves. They’d also “stolen” 2chan from a Japanese guy named, Hiroyuki Nishimura: https://t.co/I8AtBEPJee

(Due to talk of the person behind the Q account leaving 8chan and starting his own chan)

5/22
With that account would go all of Q’s followers, so they seized the account.

Their message board, their coding, their rules.

Furber couldn’t complain about it either, or it would reveal him as a fraud. He’d already gone on Infowars and talked about it like it was all real
1. This is not correct by @BBCRosAtkins


2. Firstly, the EU shared rules in the deal they did with Canada, they just did it in a different way.

3. Canada were required to sign up to several car regulations in UNECE.

4. The EU has, at minimum, 48% of the vote on any one of those regulations. With CETA, Canada agreed to share rules where it can be outvoted, and most likely will be.

5. The alignment the EU is proposing for the UK is different. It's based on dynamic alignment which is about approximating rules.
THREAD: This is it. Election Day is upon us! Here's what you need to know. First, we are CLOSED today in order to make it easy for all our staff to vote, volunteer as poll workers and monitors, and otherwise be involved in our Democracy. We will return to normal hours tomorrow.

1/ If you've yet to vote, go to
https://t.co/4sDkivd6rc to get all the info you need. Be sure to bring a mask and whatever voter ID your state requires. If you have a mail-in ballot, DO NOT MAIL IT IN: go to https://t.co/yf60tNfk2O to find out where you can drop it off. If you've

2/ voted, thank you! Now remind at least THREE friends / family members to do the same. Vote Tripling is proven to be extremely effective; don't assume someone has voted. A nudge from you can make all the difference. Again, https://t.co/4sDkivd6rc has all the info they need.

3/ If you have any questions about voting, or experience voter intimidation, call, text, or chat with the @VoterProtection hotline: https://t.co/LheFc5O2ZJ. Know your rights: no one can prevent you from exercising your sacred right to vote!

4/ If you need a ride to the polls, both @lyft and @Uber are offering discounted rides, or you can do an online search for volunteers offering rides to the polls in your area. Before you vote, be informed: click here to find what's on your ballot:
So shortly after the 2016 election, I pointed out how odd it was that the Reason homepage was dominated by stories either mocking and ridiculing the left for being fearful of what was to come, or articles about how Trump might actually be good for libertarians.


Now, in 2020, we have one party so upset about the election, they’re openly fomenting a crisis of democracy. Here’s the Reason homepage today. There’s one article about all of that. There’s a hell of a lot more about the threat posed by Joe Biden. And more riciduling the left.


I’m picking on Reason. And I’ll add that there are people there who have sufficiently grasped the threat the last four years, despite the general editorial direction of the magazine. But it really underscores the disappointment I’ve had with my fellow libertarians in general ...

... in the Trump era. We’re supposed to be the alarmists. Proudly! We’re supposed to the ones who overreact when government overreaches. Because alarmism is a hell of a lot better than complacency. And history tells us that governments tend not to give powers ...

... back once they’ve claimed them. In the Trump era, too many libertarians not only stopped being alarmists, they spent most of their time scolding and ridiculing the people who were. I mean, it’s still bizarre to me that the philosophy that ...
I think this is debatable, and we won't know the answer for a while. There are two possible trajectories here. 1/x


Trajectory 1: The attack becomes a signal event like Ruby Ridge or Waco, and extremists use it as a rallying point going forward. They will certainly try to do this, but there are some key differences.

Primarily, the tepid federal response (which is bad on most levels) doesn't compare to those events, where LE screwed up and people died as an unambiguous result of questionable or straight bad LE action rather than the melee situation here.

Also those cases were the result of proactive federal enforcement, as opposed to a clearly defense posture here.

Trajectory 2 is backlash. There's some growing evidence for that in the snap polls from the last couple days. See:

https://t.co/lOi6DCZ9CK

https://t.co/lOi6DCZ9CK

This won't affect the diehards, but it might suggest the event won't bring a lot new blood into the movement.