Decided to check out what was happening on parler regarding SCOTUS, their website is a horrific design mess, but it is interesting...

Searching the Parlor gutter for SCOTUS gold #2

This website makes me appreciate the beauty of Twitter, it's a hobgoblin of bad design that you have zero search options for!
Swimming the cesspool of Parler for SCOTUS takes #3

Seriously, this trash website will be dead in 2 years @RemindMe_OfThis
Mining the river for golden Parler SCOTUS takes #4

Apparently this theory of SCOTUS leaving the door open is quite popular (its entirely nonsense).

Also PARLER CENSORED ME!!! lmao
Frittering away my time in the tears of the right wing by finding Parler SCOTUS takes #5

Wanted to add at least on little troll into the mix! (they are all over)

Also, hashtags are literally 75% of the "parlays".
Mining my way through the muck of Parler to find SCOTUS takes #6

Milo is talking dirty to me, and I love it!

Lots of talk of the military and civil war (I dont think they realize that if they try the later, the former will crush them)
Threading the needle through the weave of nonsense that is Parler to find SCOTUS takes #7

Well, they do have an astrologer on their side, and an eclipse is coming, I'm more worried about that than their lawsuits TBH.

I think I've hit the insurrection part of the evening
Sinking into the mire of Parler to find SCOTUS takes #8

Definingly more insurrection talk, lots of Jesusland talk...

Maybe pictures drawn in sharpies would've been the way to go...
Sipping the tears of patriots on Parler to find SCOTUS takes #9

Also, lots of talk about how the constitution is null and void. And here I was thinking the Democrats were the ones that were going to kill it!

Love the "did they swear on a dictionary" line!
Slicing through the salami that is Parler to find SCOTUS takes #10

And now we are on to the "blame the founding fathers" part of the night
Limping through the MAGA minefield to find Parler SCOTUS takes #11

There is a 70/30 mixture of "REVOLUTION" and "TRUST THE PLAN" respectively...
Gonna call this thread at an even #12.

I think I need a glass of wine now.

Or maybe champagne?

More from Politics

THREAD:
Good afternoon, followers of frivolous election litigation. There's a last-minute entry in the competition for dumbest pre-inauguration lawsuit - a totally loony effort to apparently leave the entire USA without a government.

We'll start with the complaint in a minute.

But first, I want to give you a quick explanation for why I'm going to keep talking about these cases even after the inauguration.

They're part of an ongoing effort - one that's not well-coordinated but is widespread - to discredit our fundamental system of government.

It's a direct descendent, in more ways than one, of birtherism. And here's the thing about birtherism. It might have been a joke to a lot of people, but it was extremely pernicious. It obviously validated the racist "not good enough to be President" crowd. But that wasn't all.

Don't get me wrong, that was bad enough. Validating racism helped put the kind of shitbird who would tweet this from an official government account into power. But it didn't stop


(Also, if you agree with Pompeo about multiculturalism - the legendary melting pot - not being what this country is all about, you need to stop following me now. And maybe go somewhere and think about your life choices and what made you such a tool.)
All the challenges to Leader Pelosi are coming from her right, in an apparent effort to make the party even more conservative and bent toward corporate interests.

Hard pass. So long as Leader Pelosi remains the most progressive candidate for Speaker, she can count on my support.


I agree that our party should, and must, evolve our leadership.

But changed leadership should reflect an actual, evolved mission; namely, an increased commitment to the middle + working class electorate that put us here.

Otherwise it’s a just new figure with the same problems.

I hope that we can move swiftly to conclude this discussion about party positions, so that we can spend more time discussing party priorities: voting rights, healthcare, wages, climate change, housing, cannabis legalization, good jobs, etc.

You May Also Like