Thread:

My predictions for US politics in the next 4 years.

No unity, more division, economic crash, war against crypto, charges against Trump, President Harris, the new Republican Party, Don Jr running in 2024.

The division in America will grow. The tech sector, news media and social media will be split even more between left and right. New alternatives will rise and the anger between left and right will escalate.
Over 30% of all US dollars were created in 2020 to stabilize the markets and pay for the Covid pandemic. The US economy will crash and USD currency will see a steep decline in value.
As a result of economic turmoil and failing fiat currencies crypto will rise around the world and governments will make a stand against it to protect their supply of printed money. Crypto will succeed because the people will accept it as new money outside of government control.
Donald Trump will fight tax evasion charges amongst other legal battles as he will be punished by the left and parts of the right for years to come. They will do anything in their power to prevent a comeback of Donald Trump.
Within the first two years of the Biden Presidency Joe Biden will resign for health reasons and Kamala Harris will become the first female President of the United States.
The Republican Party will split between Trumpians and never Trumpers. Donald Trump Jr. will emerge as a new force in this battle. After the economic collapse the old guard will be replaced by the America First, MAGA movement.
In 2024 Donald Trump Jr. will run for President with his “we told you so” campaign in an America that is more divided than ever. Because of the economic turmoil of the Biden/Harris years Donald Trump Jr. is likely to win the 2024 election for President.
Disclaimer: I could be completely wrong about all of this 😎

Anyhow I’m looking forward to the next season of my favorite show: ‘US Empire Harakiri’

More from Politics

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
These 10 threads will teach you more than reading 100 books

Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)


10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)


Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)


10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)