E. Jean Carroll goes to court against outgoing Pres. Trump this morning, in a lawsuit accusing the lame duck of defaming her by denying that he raped her.

Trump wants to pause proceedings to appeal the ruling kicking DOJ out, but for now, it's still on.

Today is an initial telephone conference following Judge Kaplan's ruling that the DOJ can't represent Trump and ordering his personal lawyer Marc Kasowitz back on the docket.

Kasowitz's latest filing from last night: https://t.co/tsTqJanOVe
I'll be covering the proceedings live... in the remote, virtual sense of our era.
.@EJeanCarroll's lawyer @KaplanRobbie is now on the line.
The conference is slated to begin in roughly 5 minutes.
Trump's attorney Christine Montenegro from the firm Kasowitz, Benson, Torres is also on the line.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan is now on the line.

"Let me hear from the parties about where we are."
Carroll's attorney Joshua Adam Matz is up first:

Where we are is a little "confounded" by the fact that Trump's counsel waited until after 7 p.m. last night to request an adjournment.
Matz:

Trump "attempted to abuse the Justice Department."

Trump seems "desperate" to avoid the justice system, which smacks of "desperation" and "fear."
Matz gives a history of the case:

Trump's attorneys used "every stall tactic in the book," avoiding service, denying jurisdiction, seeking stays, and refusing to provide documents.
Matz:

Trump's lawyers expressed their intent to fight the case in state court, while jockeying via the DOJ to move the case to federal court.

"Of course, even then it seems like the gamesmanship continued," he notes.

DOJ tried to reschedule and refused to argue by phone.
Matz refers to this court order booting DOJ from the docket. https://t.co/ABMs6vJm88
Matz 'inexplicably delayed" filing their motion to stay proceedings until this time:

"To call that gamesmanship would be an act of charity," Matz says.
Matz wants a chance to respond to the stay request, which he says is "not warranted."

Trump "knew or darn well should have known" that these arguments were available to them earlier, he adds.
Judge Kaplan asks Trump's counsel to respond.

Paul J. Burgo from Kasowitz's firm is up.
Burgo claims SCOTUS precedent shows they are entitled to immediate appeal and stay of proceedings to argue immunity from liability.

Judge Kaplan is skeptical: "Immunity from liability and immunity from discovery are two different things, aren't they?"
Burgo says it's not so much from liability but from suit.
Judge Kaplan turns to counsel for the DOJ.

—But they're not on the call.... because the judge ruled they are not a party to the proceedings.
"Interesting," Judge Kaplan says, turning it back to Matz.

Matz: "It's sort of peculiar, your honor... Mr. Trump and his private counsel did not involve themselves in the Justice Dept.'s" motion to substitute.

There are at least potentially "waiver issues," Matz says.
Trump's attorney Paul Burgo insists the right to appeal isn't waived.

It's "sacred," he says.

DOJ isn't here because they're respecting Judge Kaplan's order, Burgo says.
Carroll's opposition papers are due on Dec. 17.

Trump's attorneys will reply after, and Burgo says he will proceed in Second Circuit "expeditiously."

Judge Kaplan: "Define expeditiously."
Burgo demurs on setting a date, and Judge Kaplan tells him it's in his best interest to clarify that soon.

Hearing adjourned.

More from Adam Klasfeld

More from Politics

My piece in the NY Times today: "the Trump administration is denying applications submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services at a rate 37 percent higher than the Obama administration did in 2016."

Based on this analysis: "Denials for immigration benefits—travel documents, work permits, green cards, worker petitions, etc.—increased 37 percent since FY 2016. On an absolute basis, FY 2018 will see more than about 155,000 more denials than FY 2016."
https://t.co/Bl0naOO0sh


"This increase in denials cannot be credited to an overall rise in applications. In fact, the total number of applications so far this year is 2 percent lower than in 2016. It could be that the higher denial rate is also discouraging some people from applying at all.."

Thanks to @gsiskind for his insightful comments. The increase in denials, he said, is “significant enough to make one think that Congress must have passed legislation changing the requirements. But we know they have not.”

My conclusion:

You May Also Like

"I really want to break into Product Management"

make products.

"If only someone would tell me how I can get a startup to notice me."

Make Products.

"I guess it's impossible and I'll never break into the industry."

MAKE PRODUCTS.

Courtesy of @edbrisson's wonderful thread on breaking into comics –
https://t.co/TgNblNSCBj – here is why the same applies to Product Management, too.


There is no better way of learning the craft of product, or proving your potential to employers, than just doing it.

You do not need anybody's permission. We don't have diplomas, nor doctorates. We can barely agree on a single standard of what a Product Manager is supposed to do.

But – there is at least one blindingly obvious industry consensus – a Product Manager makes Products.

And they don't need to be kept at the exact right temperature, given endless resource, or carefully protected in order to do this.

They find their own way.
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?