#PIDILITE (D)
- Formed Cup & handle.
- Trading is Bullish channel.
- On verge of breakout from channel
- Big volume accumulations
- Buy above 2440
- Stoploss 2345
- Targets 2500/2565/2630/2700+
TF ~ 3-6 months
More from Himanshu Chauhan
More from Pidilite
#PIDILITE Update
Swinging in a range post reversal from Point D.
In weekly; Converging trendlines along with declining volume as the price progresses is progressing.
Targets remain intact at 2320 and 2380.
#StockMarket #StockToWatch https://t.co/8q988LZ5Er
as the price is progressing*
Swinging in a range post reversal from Point D.
In weekly; Converging trendlines along with declining volume as the price progresses is progressing.
Targets remain intact at 2320 and 2380.
#StockMarket #StockToWatch https://t.co/8q988LZ5Er
#PIDILITE
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 12, 2021
Price volume action.
The setup looks good above 2273.40 for targets of 2320 followed by 2380.
[On Watchlist] #StockMarket #StocksInFocus pic.twitter.com/8htyGPIjEl
as the price is progressing*
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x