#Nifty50 in a very clear CORRECTIONAL pattern since October 2021. Does not get any clearer like this!
Target: +25% higher in major Rising Wedge.
Now think: If Nifty50 is clearly about to soar - would it then be plausible, that the US indices are about to crash?
More from Niftylongterm
Well, alarms were sound.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
Explanation for the alarm that sounded. Textbook short term top.
Clean technicals.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
Is Nifty gunning for an ultimate double zig-zag shake out towards 17k which would coincide with weekly 20 EMA and 100 DEMA tag? Fair possibility. Only time will tell. Watch for the break of 50 DEMA and support zone.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
@piyushchaudhry
If Nifty breaks 50 DEMA and closes below 17700. 17220-17150-17000 possible. Worst case scenario is ~17000. Lot of confluence support in that range.
Do your DD.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
Nifty’s daily looks like ABC is done, but internals suggests that it still needs a final sell off to make a bottom for WXY. A bull trap towards 17735-17810 can’t be ruled out before the final sell off.
Just analysis, reserve the right to be wrong.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
₹Nifty > #Nifty
Tight Bearish divergence on Nifty Weekly. Ready to snap back to Weekly 20 EMA? Current Weekly 20 EMA at 16864. Stay Cautious!
— Krunal Thakkar (@KrunallThakkar) October 22, 2021
\u20b9Nifty > #Nifty
Explanation for the alarm that sounded. Textbook short term top.
Clean technicals.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
Is Nifty gunning for an ultimate double zig-zag shake out towards 17k which would coincide with weekly 20 EMA and 100 DEMA tag? Fair possibility. Only time will tell. Watch for the break of 50 DEMA and support zone.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
@piyushchaudhry
If Nifty breaks 50 DEMA and closes below 17700. 17220-17150-17000 possible. Worst case scenario is ~17000. Lot of confluence support in that range.
Do your DD.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
Nifty’s daily looks like ABC is done, but internals suggests that it still needs a final sell off to make a bottom for WXY. A bull trap towards 17735-17810 can’t be ruled out before the final sell off.
Just analysis, reserve the right to be wrong.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x